2016
DOI: 10.1590/0001-3765201620150588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the complexity and performance of marine planktonic trophic models

Abstract: Planktonic models represent a powerful tool for creating hypotheses and making predictions about the functioning of marine ecosystems. Their complexity varies according to the number of state variables and the choice of functional forms. We evaluated plankton models during the last 15 years (n =145) with the aims of understanding why they differ in complexity, evaluating model robustness, and describing studies of plankton modelling around the globe. We classified models into four groups: Nutrient-Phytoplankto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion is consistent with the observations from many other studies of protistan herbivory (Lawrence and Menden‐Deuer and references within), yet it conflicts with a generally observed functional response of zooplankton, i.e., that ingestion rates increase, albeit not always linearly, with prey density (Ivlev ; Holling ; Frost ). The observed lack of seasonality in grazing rates implies that the functions traditionally used to describe zooplankton grazing in plankton models (Franks ; Li et al ; Leles et al ) may not be universally applicable to microzooplankton grazing, especially when bulk indices of prey abundance such as chlorophyll are used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This conclusion is consistent with the observations from many other studies of protistan herbivory (Lawrence and Menden‐Deuer and references within), yet it conflicts with a generally observed functional response of zooplankton, i.e., that ingestion rates increase, albeit not always linearly, with prey density (Ivlev ; Holling ; Frost ). The observed lack of seasonality in grazing rates implies that the functions traditionally used to describe zooplankton grazing in plankton models (Franks ; Li et al ; Leles et al ) may not be universally applicable to microzooplankton grazing, especially when bulk indices of prey abundance such as chlorophyll are used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anderson, 2005Anderson, , 2006Le Quere, 2006;Flynn, 2006;Leles et al, 2016;Shimoda and Arhonditsis, 2016). It remains an open question as to whether additional complexity is of advantage for representing biogeochemical processes and tracers on a global scale (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models can be three-dimensional and have the ability to describe ecosystem structure and functions in detail. Thus, they are useful tools to address questions focusing on plankton dynamics and physical oceanography (Franks and Chen, 2001;Aumont et al, 2015;Leles et al, 2016). NPZD models allow the combination of species into functional groups (Fasham, 1993), and therefore, these models can be used to investigate the impact of climate change on these functional groups.…”
Section: Npzd-based Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%