2014
DOI: 10.1590/0001-3765201420140301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavior and performance of sows fed different levels of fiber and reared in individual cages or collective pens

Abstract: Sixteen pregnant sows were used. The experimental design was completely randomized with a 2x2 factorial scheme consisting of two housing systems (individual cages and collective pens) and two diets (low [2.67%] and high [13.14%] level of crude fiber). Physiological, behavioral, environmental, and hormonal parameters were studied. In addition, the following productive and reproductive parameters were evaluated: weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion of the sow and piglets, number of piglets born dead and ali… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, stereotypies and abnormal repetitive behaviours are probably the most common indicators shared by many species under sub-optimal captive conditions (sows: [11]; calves: [12]; lambs: [13]). These are repetitive and invariant behaviours with no obvious goal or function [14] that should always be considered as warning signs of potential suffering, even at a low frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, stereotypies and abnormal repetitive behaviours are probably the most common indicators shared by many species under sub-optimal captive conditions (sows: [11]; calves: [12]; lambs: [13]). These are repetitive and invariant behaviours with no obvious goal or function [14] that should always be considered as warning signs of potential suffering, even at a low frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all tested heating systems, mean values of BGHI can be considered comfortable for sows in the morning on the first evaluated day. On the other hand, the mean values of BGHI were distanced from the ideal (72) in the other periods and days evaluated, as suggested by Budiño et al (2014). Table 2 shows the values of mean, median, standard deviation (σ), coefficient of variation (CV), kurtosis (Curt), asymmetry (Ass.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…A higher frequency of resting behavior and a reduction in the sudden act of chewing are findings of high-fiber diets to gestating sows (Sapkota et al, 2016). Even with no difference in the frequency of lying lateral (145 vs 252), lying ventral (284 vs 404), and standing (33 vs 28) positions of gestating sows with low or high fiber up to 3 h after feeding, Budiño et al (2014) believe that high fiber diets lead to better animal welfare and comfort. In another study, Loisel et al (2013) reported that the duration of the farrowing process was not affected by high-fiber diets; however, the birth process began faster in sows fed the high-fiber diet than in the group fed the low-fiber diet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%