2010
DOI: 10.1509/jppm.29.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to the Special Section on Stakeholder Marketing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Broadly, this study addresses recent calls for stakeholder marketing research that expands the scope of traditional marketing concepts to include additional stakeholders beyond the widely-studied customers (e.g., Bhattacharya 2010;Ferrell et al 2010;Hillebrand et al 2015;Hult et al 2011). It achieves this by developing the concept of stakeholder-focused organizational learning, which is more encompassing than marketbased organizational learning (e.g., Sinkula et al 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Broadly, this study addresses recent calls for stakeholder marketing research that expands the scope of traditional marketing concepts to include additional stakeholders beyond the widely-studied customers (e.g., Bhattacharya 2010;Ferrell et al 2010;Hillebrand et al 2015;Hult et al 2011). It achieves this by developing the concept of stakeholder-focused organizational learning, which is more encompassing than marketbased organizational learning (e.g., Sinkula et al 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the stakeholder approach's recent conception (e.g., Chabowski et al 2011), the limited work on it in the strategic marketing literature has been largely conceptual (e.g., Hillebrand et al 2015) and exploratory (e.g., Mish and Scammon 2010). While progress has been made in understanding the elements of stakeholder marketing (e.g., Bhattacharya 2010;Hult et al 2011), identifying the relevant stakeholders of marketing (e.g., Hult et al 2011), and distinguishing the stakeholder marketing perspective from the traditional marketing perspective (Hillebrand et al 2015), important gaps remain in the literature. For example, it has been proposed that stakeholder marketing requires organizations to be Bdedicated to learning about and addressing stakeholder issues^ (Ferrell et al 2010, p. 95).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proponents of stakeholder marketing argue that the marketing function should pay attention to multiple internal and external stakeholders, and should not privilege customers over other stakeholders or have customers as the sole target of marketing activities (Bhattacharya 2010;Ferrell et al 2010;Fry and Polonsky 2004;Maignan et al 2005;Smith et al 2010). The intent behind such arguments is to correct a prevailing marketing bias that on the one hand leads to an excessive, and even obsessive, preoccupation with customers, and on the other hand manifests itself as a single-minded focus on the customer to the exclusion of other stakeholders, which is regarded by Smith et al (2010) as one of the symptoms of what they call a "new marketing myopia."…”
Section: Stakeholder Perspective and Ccsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We evaluate their call through the lenses of the emerging (1) stakeholder marketing literature (Bhattacharya 2010), (2) Service Dominant Logic (SDL, Vargo and Lusch 2004) theory of marketing, as well as (3) Sirgy's (2012b) argument that public policy should be informed and guided, at least in part, by happiness research-in particular, the emerging quality of life (QOL) literature. The results suggest that all three emerging literature streams generally support calls to move the marketing of higher education away from today's prominent marketization emphases.…”
Section: Eudaimonic Forms Of Stakeholder Satisfaction In Higher Educamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bhattacharya (2010) similarly points out that traditional marketing strategy tends to be predominantly firm-centric, as in the case of marketization practices. Stewart (2010) argues that there has been a recognizable shift in stakeholder marketing research from a focus on regulation of the marketing function and its activities to a more balanced treatment of the reciprocity of marketing and society.…”
Section: The Emerging Stakeholder Marketing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%