2022
DOI: 10.1186/s41155-022-00214-2
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale – Short Form (DERS-SF): psychometric properties and invariance between genders

Abstract: Background The understanding of how individuals manage their emotional experiences has flourished dramatically over the last decades, including assessing of emotion (dys)regulation. The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) is a well-validated and extensively used self-report instrument for emotion regulation problems. Despite the wide use of DERS in both clinical and research settings, its length potentially increases fatigue and frustration in respondents and limits its inclusion in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In another cross-sectional study, in contrast to our study, the "Impulse" subscale score was found to be higher for women than men [22]. On the other hand, some crosssectional studies found no significant relationship between sex and impulsive behaviors [3,25,26]. This result can be explained as a limitation of our study because the number of women was higher than the number of men.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In another cross-sectional study, in contrast to our study, the "Impulse" subscale score was found to be higher for women than men [22]. On the other hand, some crosssectional studies found no significant relationship between sex and impulsive behaviors [3,25,26]. This result can be explained as a limitation of our study because the number of women was higher than the number of men.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Following publication of the original article (Gouveia et al, 2022 ), the below funding note was missing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%