2016
DOI: 10.1177/2326409816669374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Content Validity of the Investigator-Rated ADHD Rating Scale Version IV Instrument Inattention Subscale for Use in Adults With Phenylketonuria

Abstract: Content validity of the 18-item Investigator-Rated Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Rating Scale IV (I-ADHD RS-IV) with adult prompts was investigated using qualitative interviews of US clinicians who had prior experience rating adults with phenylketonuria (PKU) using the I-ADHD RS-IV. Fourteen qualitative interviews were conducted to obtain key symptom experiences of adults with PKU and assessed the relevance, clarity, and administration of the I-ADHD RS-IV. Participants (n = 13, 92.9%) endorse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When this initial screening is positive, the entire BRIEF should be completed to understand the spectrum and severity of deficits in executive functioning. It is recognized that results obtained on screening tools, such as the BRIEF, may reflect the impact of limited self-awareness, which can be present in some patients with PKU due to the neurocognitive impairments, complicating self-assessment of symptoms [69,70]. In such situations, alternate versions of the BRIEF are available, permitting perspectives from another informant (e.g., spouse, parent or caregiver), while rating scales could also be combined with more objective performancebased tasks.…”
Section: %mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When this initial screening is positive, the entire BRIEF should be completed to understand the spectrum and severity of deficits in executive functioning. It is recognized that results obtained on screening tools, such as the BRIEF, may reflect the impact of limited self-awareness, which can be present in some patients with PKU due to the neurocognitive impairments, complicating self-assessment of symptoms [69,70]. In such situations, alternate versions of the BRIEF are available, permitting perspectives from another informant (e.g., spouse, parent or caregiver), while rating scales could also be combined with more objective performancebased tasks.…”
Section: %mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, adults with PKU may lack self-awareness due to neuropsychological impairments. This lack of self-awareness hampers self-rating of symptoms, which may seem evident to a clinician or familiar observer [20] . Additionally, patients with PKU may be reluctant to attribute symptoms that they are experiencing to their PKU.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%