2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2021.100810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A non-interventional observational study to identify and validate clinical outcome assessments for adults with phenylketonuria for use in clinical trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When this initial screening is positive, the entire BRIEF should be completed to understand the spectrum and severity of deficits in executive functioning. It is recognized that results obtained on screening tools, such as the BRIEF, may reflect the impact of limited self-awareness, which can be present in some patients with PKU due to the neurocognitive impairments, complicating self-assessment of symptoms [69,70]. In such situations, alternate versions of the BRIEF are available, permitting perspectives from another informant (e.g., spouse, parent or caregiver), while rating scales could also be combined with more objective performancebased tasks.…”
Section: %mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When this initial screening is positive, the entire BRIEF should be completed to understand the spectrum and severity of deficits in executive functioning. It is recognized that results obtained on screening tools, such as the BRIEF, may reflect the impact of limited self-awareness, which can be present in some patients with PKU due to the neurocognitive impairments, complicating self-assessment of symptoms [69,70]. In such situations, alternate versions of the BRIEF are available, permitting perspectives from another informant (e.g., spouse, parent or caregiver), while rating scales could also be combined with more objective performancebased tasks.…”
Section: %mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unaffected individuals may sometimes more accurately reflect the impact of a disease and its treatment due to adaptation of patients to a particular health state [ 102 ]. In PKU, QoL assessments are further complicated by the fact that elevated blood Phe concentrations can lead to clouded judgement, hampering self-evaluation of the impact of PKU and its management on a patient’s QoL [ 26 , 103 ]. Similar to other clinical outcome assessments, generic QoL measurement tools have limited validity in PKU due to the lack of sensitivity to assess the impact of problems specifically encountered by patients with PKU [ 81 , 82 , 103 , 104 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In PKU, QoL assessments are further complicated by the fact that elevated blood Phe concentrations can lead to clouded judgement, hampering self-evaluation of the impact of PKU and its management on a patient’s QoL [ 26 , 103 ]. Similar to other clinical outcome assessments, generic QoL measurement tools have limited validity in PKU due to the lack of sensitivity to assess the impact of problems specifically encountered by patients with PKU [ 81 , 82 , 103 , 104 ]. When applying a PKU-specific QoL questionnaire that considered the burden of diet among other PKU-specific QoL domains, the highest impact scores were indeed related to the emotional impact of PKU and its disease management [ 81 , 82 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding examinations, it should be noted that there is a lack of validated screening tools for the adult population. In addition, AwPKU who have been exposed to high blood Phe often experience impairment in neurocognition that can further complicate the completion of self-assessments [82]. Therefore, it is recommended to combine these assessments with more objective performancebased tasks, such as the index finger tapping rate and Archimedes spiral [83].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%