2019
DOI: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2018052000648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life course and work ability among older adults

Abstract: OBJECTIVE To examine factors associated with perception of work ability in a nationally representative sample of Brazilians aged 50 years and over.METHODS We used data from 8,903 participants of the baseline survey of the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSI-Brazil). The dependent variable was self-rated work ability (good or very good versus fair, poor, or very poor). Independent variables included factors that operate at the beginning, middle, and current stage of life. Multivariate analysis was based… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the ELSI-Brazil, participants were asked, “In general, how would you evaluate your health?” The response options were “very good or excellent” (6.5%), “good” (36.0%), “regular” (45.3%), “bad” (7.8%) or “very bad” (4.3%). In line with numerous prior studies using ELSI data, we dichotomized this variable by collapsing the top two categories (“very good or excellent” and “good”) and the bottom three categories (“regular,” “bad,” and “very bad”) ( Castro et al, 2018 ; Castro, Lima-Costa et al, 2020 ; Castro et al, 2020 , Castro et al, 2020 ; Fagundes, Amaral Júnior, Menegazzo, Hugo, & Giordani, 2022 ; Seixas, 2021 ; Seixas & Freitas, 2021 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the ELSI-Brazil, participants were asked, “In general, how would you evaluate your health?” The response options were “very good or excellent” (6.5%), “good” (36.0%), “regular” (45.3%), “bad” (7.8%) or “very bad” (4.3%). In line with numerous prior studies using ELSI data, we dichotomized this variable by collapsing the top two categories (“very good or excellent” and “good”) and the bottom three categories (“regular,” “bad,” and “very bad”) ( Castro et al, 2018 ; Castro, Lima-Costa et al, 2020 ; Castro et al, 2020 , Castro et al, 2020 ; Fagundes, Amaral Júnior, Menegazzo, Hugo, & Giordani, 2022 ; Seixas, 2021 ; Seixas & Freitas, 2021 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Work obstacles could not be generalized. Older workers, absence of technological skills, work conditions, work experiences Policy [ 39 ] To investigate factors related to perceived work ability in a sample of Brazilians sample aged 50 years and more Longitudinal study (surveys). Study sample—8903 workers aged 50 years and over.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High levels of social inequality are found in the majority of topics investigated, with the poorest or those with lower educational level affected most. Inequalities are observed in physical activity 7 , oral health status 8 , limitations to perform basic activities of daily living 9 , frailty 10 , adequate control of hypertension 11 , underutilization of medications due to financial reasons 12 , source of health care 13 , and capacity to work 14 . Social participation 15 and the fear of falling 16 are associated with the urban environment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in the performance of primary care among users of the SUS are found, with a better performance of the Family Health Strategy compared to the traditional basic units 13 . Incapacity to work 14 , as well as the receipt of pensions 22 are associated with worse health conditions. However, people who receive pensions are more autonomous and have more financial security 22 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%