Apresentação

Alvarez, Marcos César; Sozzo, Máximo; Chies-Santos, Mariana

doi:10.11606/0103-2070.ts.2020.178517

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 19 publications

(19 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These other discursive matrices—with their plural theoretical vocabularies—were imported fundamentally from the English-speaking world (e.g. the United States and the United Kingdom), although the French and Italian contexts have also been playing significant roles—albeit with some variation over time and space (Alagia and Codino, 2019: 189–464; Alvarez et al, 2020: 12–15; Anitua, 2005; 418–26, 2023; Cordeiro, 2020; Garcia and Sozzo, 2023; Sozzo, 2006: 384–417, 2020: 119–120, 123–135).…”

Section: Inequality Subordination and Dependence In Production And C...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Reading penalty from the periphery

Sozzo

2023

Theoretical Criminology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article presents a critical reflection on the task of reading penality from the periphery, adding to several significant contributions in punishment and society studies. It explores the center/periphery, North/South differentiations and their uses in recent social theory as a useful tool for studying contemporary penality at a global scale. It argues that previous modes of analysis did not put relations of inequality, subordination and dependence between different regions of the world in their agenda of research, because they were overwhelmingly concerned with penal processes and dynamics in the central contexts. Instead, it calls for placing at center stage the effects of imperialism and colonialism, in their different forms throughout history, in ways of thinking and acting in relation to penality and the center/periphery. From there, the article identifies some paradoxes and risks, as well as antidotes that provide a horizon for our future research.

show abstract

Section: Inequality Subordination and Dependence In Production And C...mentioning

confidence: 99%