2019
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1688812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Masticatory Behavior on Muscle Compensations During the Oral Phase of Swallowing of Smokers

Abstract: Introduction Chewing and swallowing are physiologically interconnected functions, which share motor structures and supranuclear regions of the central nervous system (CNS), involving a sensorimotor synchrony. Objective To analyze the influence of masticatory behavior on muscular compensations in the oral phase of swallowing in smokers compared with nonsmokers. Methods A cross-sectional study comparing smokers and nonsmokers composed of 24 participants in each group. The aspects of food … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nicotine is a chemically active substance that may be associated with motor activity (15). Sleep and awake bruxisms are masticatory muscle activities during sleep (characterized as rhythmic or non-rhythmic) and wakefulness (characterized by repetitive or sustained tooth contact or bracing or thrusting of the mandible), respectively (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nicotine is a chemically active substance that may be associated with motor activity (15). Sleep and awake bruxisms are masticatory muscle activities during sleep (characterized as rhythmic or non-rhythmic) and wakefulness (characterized by repetitive or sustained tooth contact or bracing or thrusting of the mandible), respectively (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation of the swallowing function was always performed by a single clinician (the author E.C.) with experience in the area, as previously reported in literature [ 26 , 27 ]. Lip strength detection was standardized and performed on each subject after a proper training session by the same operator.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over time, differences were tested with a paired samples t-test for normally distributed data. In addition, data from clinical evaluations of swallowing were recorded as nominal variables dichotomized as corrected/uncorrected swallowing patterns, as previously reported in literature [ 27 ] and then described as frequencies of patients with corrected/uncorrected swallowing for each month of follow-up. For each test, p -value was set at 0.05 level.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%