1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0961-9534(97)00016-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal dynamics of nutrient accumulation and partitioning in the perennial C4-grasses Miscanthus × giganteus and Spartina cynosuroides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

35
209
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 249 publications
(247 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
35
209
3
Order By: Relevance
“…C 4 plants are known to accumulate nitrogen in higher quantities when compared to C 3 plants, such as annual garden rocket (Ehleringer & Monson, 1993). This relationship between higher nitrogen uptake efficiency in C 4 plants has also been reported in many grass species (Beale & Long, 1997;Rubio et al, 2010); and occurs due to the higher energy requirements of C 4 carbon fixation, particularly with regards to rubisco activity during photosynthesis which becomes saturated with CO 2 (Carmo-Silva et al, 2010;Ghannoum et al, 2005).…”
Section: Response To Abiotic Factorssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…C 4 plants are known to accumulate nitrogen in higher quantities when compared to C 3 plants, such as annual garden rocket (Ehleringer & Monson, 1993). This relationship between higher nitrogen uptake efficiency in C 4 plants has also been reported in many grass species (Beale & Long, 1997;Rubio et al, 2010); and occurs due to the higher energy requirements of C 4 carbon fixation, particularly with regards to rubisco activity during photosynthesis which becomes saturated with CO 2 (Carmo-Silva et al, 2010;Ghannoum et al, 2005).…”
Section: Response To Abiotic Factorssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Reported results represent annual production of biomass consisted of stems, leaves and inflorescences. During winter nutrients were transferred from the aboveground parts back to rhizomes and used in next vegetative period (Beale and Long 1997), most of the leaves were rip off by the wind and stems were dried, yield decreased about 30% but biomass quality increased (Lewandowski and Heinz 2003).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crop is established via the propogation of rhizome cuttings and is harvested annually. In contrast to first-generation biofuel feedstocks, its demand for added fertilisers is low due to an efficient nutrient handling capacity -at the end of the growing season, nutrients are translocated from the stems and leaves to the rhizomes for storage and utilisation the following season [127]. This is likely to ensure that the nitrous oxide emissions from Miscanthus-producing soils will be significantly less than for first generation feedstocks [128,129] [12].…”
Section: Miscanthusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important, however, that such a practice considers the dynamics of nutrient transfer in the plant and any associated effects on stand fertility in subsequent years [127,137]. This study assumes that early winter biomass yields will be 40% higher than those seen in the spring.…”
Section: Miscanthusmentioning
confidence: 99%