2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbe.2018.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Filling gaps in species distributions through the study of biological collections: 415 new distribution records for Neotropical Cryptinae (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2). This pattern of biased sampling near highways, rivers, coasts, and cities has been reported in several taxonomic groups (Hijmans et al, 2000;Kadmon et al, 2003;Reddy & Dávalos, 2003;Newbold, 2010;Santos & Hoppe, 2018), which is explained by the ease access, researchers' interest in certain areas or taxa, and limited financial resources. However, further studies are required to reduce this sampling bias by using different collection methodologies and accessing previously unexplored sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…2). This pattern of biased sampling near highways, rivers, coasts, and cities has been reported in several taxonomic groups (Hijmans et al, 2000;Kadmon et al, 2003;Reddy & Dávalos, 2003;Newbold, 2010;Santos & Hoppe, 2018), which is explained by the ease access, researchers' interest in certain areas or taxa, and limited financial resources. However, further studies are required to reduce this sampling bias by using different collection methodologies and accessing previously unexplored sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Thus far, a total of 10 subfamilies, 30 genera and 49 species are listed for Uruguay (Yu et al 2016, Santos & Aguiar 2018, Santos & Hoppe 2018, Supeleto et al 2019): Anomaloninae (Parania Morley, 1913, Banchinae (Glypta Gravenhorst, 1829), Campopleginae (Campoletis Förster, 1869;Casinaria Holmgren, 1859;Diadegma Förster, 1869;Venturia Schrottky, 1902), Cryptinae (Aeglocryptus Porter, 1987;Chromocryptus Ashmead, 1900;Compsocryptus Ashmead, 1900;Digonocryptus Viereck, 1913;Dotocryptus Brèthes, 1919;Mallochia Viereck, 1912;Messatoporus Cushman, 1929;Neocryptopteryx Blanchard, 1947;Phycitiplex Porter, 1987;Trachysphyrus Haliday, 1836), Diplazontinae (Diplazon Nees, 1819), Ichneumoninae (Matara Holmgren, 1868;Thymebatis Brèthes, 1909;Trogomorpha Ashmead, 1900), Ophioninae (Enicospilus Stephens, 1835;Ophion Fabricius, 1798;Thyreodon Brullé, 1846), Phygadeuontinae (Chirotica Förster, 1869), Pimplinae (Calliephialtes Ashmead, 1900;Itoplectis Förster, 1869;Neotheronia Krieger, 1899;Pimpla Fabricius, 1804;Tromatobia Förster, 1869) and Tersilochinae (Stethantyx Townes, 1971), and among which, at least nine genera (Campoletis, Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829, Casinaria, Diadegma, Enicospilus, Itoplectis, Ophion, Stethantyx [= Thersilochus] and Venturia) have economic importance as biological control agents in Uruguay (Bentancourt et al 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%