2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbe.2015.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can sibling species of the Drosophila willistoni subgroup be recognized through combined microscopy techniques?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although monomorphic non-melanic tergite color was the most common phenotype among saltans species (Supplementary Figure S3) (De Magalhaes, 1956), we observed male-limited pigmentation phenotypes for D. sturtevanti (Figure 2) and D. emarginata (Supplementary Figure S3). Within the willistoni species group, all species analyzed (Supplementary Figure S4) or reported in the literature (Zanini et al, 2015) exhibit a monomorphic nonmelanic tergite color.…”
Section: Sexually Dimorphic Pigmentation Is Widespread Within the Sopmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although monomorphic non-melanic tergite color was the most common phenotype among saltans species (Supplementary Figure S3) (De Magalhaes, 1956), we observed male-limited pigmentation phenotypes for D. sturtevanti (Figure 2) and D. emarginata (Supplementary Figure S3). Within the willistoni species group, all species analyzed (Supplementary Figure S4) or reported in the literature (Zanini et al, 2015) exhibit a monomorphic nonmelanic tergite color.…”
Section: Sexually Dimorphic Pigmentation Is Widespread Within the Sopmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the preceding studies, some relationships were incongruent between data partitions and barely supported. Additionally, despite morphological studies [15][16][17][18][19][20][21], there is no phylogenetic reconstruction of the willistoni subgroup based on morphological characters or a strong time estimation of the cladistic events. Although past studies tried to differentiate D. paulistorum semispecies, some authors believe that there are no sufficient differences in the [19,22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D. willistoni can be subdivided into three subspecies: D. w. willistoni , D. w. winge , and D. w. quechua ( Ayala and Tracey, 1973 ; Mardiros et al, 2016 ) , that have different geographic distributions. As shown in Figure 1 , D. willistoni has a predominantly neotropical distribution, from Mexico and south Florida to the southernmost part of South America and from the Pacific to the Atlantic oceans ( Spassky et al, 1971 ; Zanini et al, 2015 ). The strains used in the in-situ and in-silico analyses represent populations arranged along the geographic distribution of the different subspecies ( Figure 1 ): D. willistoni -Gd-H4-1 (Guadeloupe Island - willistoni subspecies), D. willistoni -WIP-4 (Bahia, Brazil - winge subspecies), and D. willistoni -SG12.00 (Montevideo, Uruguay - winge subspecies), used in in-situ and in-silico analyses; and D. willistoni-L17 (Uruguay - winge subspecies) and D. willistoni-00 (Santa Maria de Ostuna, Nicaragua - willistoni subspecies) used only in in-silico analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2007 ). Strain Gd-H4-1 lacks the high degree of polymorphism and variability found in natural populations of this widely distributed tropical species (review by Zanini et al, 2015 ). Two additional strains of D. willistoni were recently sequenced by Kim et al (2021 ), who found considerable differences between these strains in the number of repetitive sequences such as transposons and microsatellite elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%