2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbce.2018.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efeitos agudos da ingestão de cafeína no desempenho em teste específico de pádel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the trials assessed showed an unclear level in the criteria of selection bias, both in the randomized treatment order and in the evaluation of the carry-over effect. Only the trials by , [26] Lopez-Samanes; 2020 [36] and Abian; 2015 [40] suitably described the tools used for randomization treatment, while trials by Wu; 2010 [34], Yang; 2017 [38], Abian; 2015 [40] and Muller; 2019 [45] used tests to check if the washout time between conditions was suitable. Moreover, most of the studies also showed a high risk of detection bias except for trials by Gallo-Salazar; 2015 [30] and Abian; 2015 [40], which specifically indicated that blinding was kept until the statistical analysis was performed.…”
Section: Risk Of Bias and Quality Assessment Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Most of the trials assessed showed an unclear level in the criteria of selection bias, both in the randomized treatment order and in the evaluation of the carry-over effect. Only the trials by , [26] Lopez-Samanes; 2020 [36] and Abian; 2015 [40] suitably described the tools used for randomization treatment, while trials by Wu; 2010 [34], Yang; 2017 [38], Abian; 2015 [40] and Muller; 2019 [45] used tests to check if the washout time between conditions was suitable. Moreover, most of the studies also showed a high risk of detection bias except for trials by Gallo-Salazar; 2015 [30] and Abian; 2015 [40], which specifically indicated that blinding was kept until the statistical analysis was performed.…”
Section: Risk Of Bias and Quality Assessment Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, most of the studies also showed a high risk of detection bias except for trials by Gallo-Salazar; 2015 [30] and Abian; 2015 [40], which specifically indicated that blinding was kept until the statistical analysis was performed. Five studies [27,38,42,44,45] were at a high risk of performance bias due to incomplete blinding or a lack of blinding. Table 4.…”
Section: Risk Of Bias and Quality Assessment Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations