2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.rausp.2016.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding institutions: different paradigms, different conclusions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
12
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Members' perceptions about the cost of losses or profits obtained from institutions affect the form of structural strength in binding members within the institution, this clarity of perception encourages members to connect with the institution. The formation of cognitive institutions resulting from human intersubjectivity and individual interpretation can result from the selection process in conducting attention, judgment, and the formation and categorization of concepts and attributes and emotions at the individual level [14].…”
Section: Political Contestationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Members' perceptions about the cost of losses or profits obtained from institutions affect the form of structural strength in binding members within the institution, this clarity of perception encourages members to connect with the institution. The formation of cognitive institutions resulting from human intersubjectivity and individual interpretation can result from the selection process in conducting attention, judgment, and the formation and categorization of concepts and attributes and emotions at the individual level [14].…”
Section: Political Contestationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several approaches used to explain the role of local knowledge in institutional development, including; rational approach, historical approach, sociological approach and discursive institutional approach [19]. These four different approaches can be used overlapping one another, without separating the use of one approach from another to explain a social institutional phenomenon.…”
Section: Social Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alguns estudiosos argumentam que as instituições praticamente determinam as ações dos indivíduos (Friel, 2017) a medida que definem as preferências e o poder na sociedade (Powell & DiMaggio, 1991;Thelen & Steinmo, 1992), e ao mesmo tempo em que fornecem os significados compartilhados e quadros cognitivos que moldam como os humanos interpretam o comportamento dos outros (Fligstein, 2001;Hall & Taylor, 2003).…”
Section: Teoria Institucional: Contribuições Da Perspectiva Práticaunclassified
“…A teoria institucional pode ser abordada através de várias vertentes, três delas tradicionalmente conhecidas como: a escolha racional, o institucionalismo histórico e a vertente sociológica; além dessas, ainda existem a vertente discursiva abordada por Schmidt (2010), e duas vertentes neoinstitucionalistas: o institucionalismo construtivista e o institucionalismo das redes (Hall & Taylor, 2003). Ambas as perspectivas não são excludentes, mas complementares entre si (Lima, Machado, & Gerassi, 2011;Friel, 2017;Schmidt;Hall & Taylor, 2003). A perspectiva da escolha racional pressupõe que os atores tenham preferências fixas e agem racionalmente para maximizar suas preferências.…”
Section: Teoria Institucional: Contribuições Da Perspectiva Práticaunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation