2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jped.2018.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

STRONGkids validation: tool accuracy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
6

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(37 reference statements)
1
8
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…13 A 2020 study noted sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV values of 84.8%, 26.7%, 49.8%, and 67.2%, respectively. 8 The variation in outcomes may have been due to differences in interpretation of each STRONGkids parameter. The STRONGkids assessment is subjective, thus, different assessors may interpret it differently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13 A 2020 study noted sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV values of 84.8%, 26.7%, 49.8%, and 67.2%, respectively. 8 The variation in outcomes may have been due to differences in interpretation of each STRONGkids parameter. The STRONGkids assessment is subjective, thus, different assessors may interpret it differently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This tool can easily be incorporated in clinical practice for the identification of nutritional risk in children and adolescents. 8,9 Several studies have shown that this tool was associated with anthropometric measurements during pediatric inpatient admission. [10][11][12] Early risk detection needs to be carried out immediately to prevent hospital malnutrition, nutrition-related complications, growth disorders, risk of infections, and prolonged hospitalization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maciel's research et al year 2018 regarding the validation of STRONGKids to get sensitivity results 84.8%, specificity 26.7%, positive predictive value 49.8%, and negative predictive value 67.2%, when patients at nutritional risk were identified by anthropometry (9) .…”
Section: Sensitivity and Specificity Analysis Of Strongkids As Hospital Screening Test For Malnutrition In Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of these Tools, the Screening for Risk in Nutritional Status and Growth (STRONGkids), has been validated for the Brazilian population Texeira & Viana (2016). STRONGkids performs well in assessing nutritional status upon hospital admission Gouveia et al (2018), has good accuracy, high sensitivity in early detection of nutritional risk Maciel et al (2020), and appears to be directly associated with length of hospital stay Gouveia et al (2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%