2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.htct.2018.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of an instrument to assess Brazilian healthcare professional providers’ knowledge on sickle cell disease

Abstract: Objective To develop and validate DFConhecimento , an instrument to assess Brazilian healthcare professional providers’ knowledge on sickle cell disease. Method Study carried out in four stages: (1) instrument development; (2) content validation by an Expert Committee; (3) cultural adequacy check at pre-test; (4) instrument reliability analysis by healthcare professional providers supported by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient calculation. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each question, 1 point was assigned to each correctly answered item and 0 points otherwise. For calculation of the overall knowledge on SCD, the sum of all correct answers for diagnosis and treatment was taken, considering the following knowledge score ranges: >7 (more than 54% accuracy), good; ≤7 (54% or less accuracy), poor (Diniz et al, 2019a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For each question, 1 point was assigned to each correctly answered item and 0 points otherwise. For calculation of the overall knowledge on SCD, the sum of all correct answers for diagnosis and treatment was taken, considering the following knowledge score ranges: >7 (more than 54% accuracy), good; ≤7 (54% or less accuracy), poor (Diniz et al, 2019a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data on the sociodemographic characteristics (age, sex, level of education, duration since graduation, years of practice, level of facility, professional cadre, and short course training on SCD) and level of knowledge on SCD (overall, diagnosis and treatment) were obtained using a pre-tested and validated self-administered questionnaire adapted from Brazil (Diniz et al, 2019a) and modified to fit local context. Questions on SCD covered knowledge on diagnosis disease genotype, ideal timing of screening for SCD, confirmatory tests for SCD, clinical features of SCD, conditions that favor sickling of RBCs in patients with SCD warning signs in SCD, and knowledge on treatment of SCD (management of acute complications of SCD, drugs used to treat pain crises in patients with SCD, drugs used to prevent and/or treat complications of SCD, indications for use of antibiotics in SCD, indications for blood transfusion to patients with SCD, means of preventing infections in patients with SCD as well as pregnancy, and use of contraception in patients with SCD).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the I-CVI value of an item was >0.8 ( Polit et al, 2007 ), the item was deemed valid. Following content validation by the panel of five experts, a 20-item scale was finalized with a content validity index of 0.83 or higher ( Polit et al, 2007 ; Diniz et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Knowledge acquired by health professionals improves the quality of care and management of the disease, due to better understanding of the social, care-related, environmental, biological, and scientific dimensions of SCD. 12 Undoubtedly, there has been a significant increase in the availability of assessment scales and/or questionnaires; 13 however, many of these instruments do not carry adequate evidence of validation. [14][15][16] In the dental literature consulted, no previously validated instrument for assessing dentists´ knowledge about SCD was found.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%