2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjp.2016.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaf venation pattern to recognize austral South American medicinal species of “cow's hoof” ( Bauhinia L., Fabaceae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2015; Fortunato et al. 2017). Several studies have suggested new organizations of this large genus, and historical factors have complicated its taxonomy and nomenclature (Wunderlin et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2015; Fortunato et al. 2017). Several studies have suggested new organizations of this large genus, and historical factors have complicated its taxonomy and nomenclature (Wunderlin et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1999; Fortunato et al. 2017). The correct identification of species is difficult, and inaccuracies can cause misidentification of species, resulting in reduced effectiveness of the extracts (Ferreres et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fruits are dehiscent legumes with several flattened, oval, bright, and blackish seeds. It is used as ornamental and the leaves and young stems are consumed in infusions mainly as antidiabetic or hypoglycemic agent [20][21][22][23][24][25]. Anti-inflammatory, diuretic, and analgesic activities have also been reported in this species [26,27].…”
Section: Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 According to Soares and co-workers 4 , B. candicans is used synonymously to indicate the subspecies pruinosa of B. forficata L. 4 Additionally, medicinal properties have been reported for B. bauhinioides, B. cheilantha, B. holophylla, B. microstachya, B. rufa and B. ungulate. 6 A comparative study with B. forficata, B. candicans, and B. variegata was performed by Soares and Scarminio who used multivariate analysis and mixture designs to verify the authenticity of the species based on fingerprints obtained by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). 4 Through Principal Component Analysis (PCA), species were discriminated into four groups and the authors suggested that B. candicans was different from other species; therefore, it could not be regarded as synonymous of B. forficata as affirmed earlier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, quick, and low-cost auxiliary tools to assist with the correct identification of these plants are necessary since current taxonomic classifications are not infallible, especially concerning the differentiation between species and/or subspecies that have subtle morphological differences. [5][6][7][8] Taking this into consideration, the aim of the current study was to perform an exploratory analysis of commercial and certified noncommercial samples of plants belonging to the Bauhinia genus. To accomplish this, the fingerprints obtained by spectroscopic and spectrometric methods were analyzed using chemometric tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%