2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2019.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of temporal muscle fascia and tragal cartilage perichondrium in endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty with limited elevation of tympanomeatal flap

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(31 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concurrent articles on cartilage tympanoplasty frequently report hearing thresholds or averages using the highest frequency of 2000 Hz, 3,5,13,29 3000 Hz 1 , 8,28,[30][31][32] or 4000 Hz. 2,4,6,12,14,15,[33][34][35][36] Were we to narrow our reporting to these same levels or simply present a pure tone average, the high frequency loss presented here would have been missed, since statistical significance was only noted at 4000, 6000 and 8000 Hz.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Concurrent articles on cartilage tympanoplasty frequently report hearing thresholds or averages using the highest frequency of 2000 Hz, 3,5,13,29 3000 Hz 1 , 8,28,[30][31][32] or 4000 Hz. 2,4,6,12,14,15,[33][34][35][36] Were we to narrow our reporting to these same levels or simply present a pure tone average, the high frequency loss presented here would have been missed, since statistical significance was only noted at 4000, 6000 and 8000 Hz.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Even though otologists have been performing surgeries to treat this condition for more than five decades, the choice of graft and surgical techniques have always been a controversy. Nevertheless, surgical experience and personal preference of the surgeon plays a paramount role in repair approach selection ( Özdamar and Sen, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kaya et al and Çayir et al have reported a high success rate (96–97%) with cartilage tympanoplasty; similar results have been noted by Ozbek, Yegin and Friedman et al 10 12 25 26 27 On the other hand, Demirci, Şen et al and Özdamar et al have noted no difference in cartilage and fascia tympanoplasties: whereas Bozdemir et al found better results with fascia, compared with conchal cartilage. 28 29 30 31 Mohamad et al, in their systematic review, reported that tympanoplasties with cartilage to have a better morphological outcome than fascia; however, they did not find much difference in hearing outcomes. 32 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%