Background and Objectives: Most studies based on self-reported data indicate that female patients more often than males have a same-gender preference for their primary care physician (PCP). Because self-reported preferences may not reflect true preferences, we analyzed objective data to investigate patients’ preferences for PCP gender. Methods: Analyses were performed on 2192 new patients seen within a university-based healthcare system by 13 PCPs (2 male, 11 female) during 2017. New patients were asked about their PCP gender preference when assigned a PCP. We compared the expected prevalence (proportion of males/females in overall patient population) and observed prevalence (gender distribution of patients for each PCP) by PCP gender. A mixed model with PCP as a random effect examined the odds of male and female patients being assigned a same-gender physician. Results: The expected prevalence of new patients was 65% female and 35% male. The observed prevalence (95% confidence interval [CI]) of male patients among male and female PCPs was, respectively, 59.7% (49.0%-69.5%) and 28.0% (24.0%-32.4%), with neither CI containing the expected prevalence of male patients (35%). Similarly, the observed prevalence of female patients among male and female PCPs was, respectively, 40.3% (95% CI 30.5%-51.0%) and 72.0% (95% CI 67.6%-76.0%), with neither CI containing the expected prevalence of female patients (65%). Conclusions: Both male and female patients often preferred to see a same-gender PCP with this preference more pronounced in males. Future research should seek to clarify the relationships between patients’ gender preferences, patient-physician gender concordance/discordance, patient satisfaction, and health outcomes.

Objective This study aimed to describe the microscopic over-under cartilage tympanoplasty technique, provide hearing results and detail clinically significant complications. Method This was a retrospective case series chart review study of over-under cartilage tympanoplasty procedures performed by the senior author between January 2015 and January 2019 at three tertiary care centres. Cases were excluded for previous or intra-operative cholesteatoma, if a mastoidectomy was performed during the procedure or if ossiculoplasty was performed. Hearing results and complications were obtained. Results Sixty-eight tympanoplasty procedures met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 13 years (range, 3–71 years). The mean improvement in pure tone average was 6 dB (95 per cent confidence interval 4–9 dB; p < 0.0001). The overall perforation closure rate was 97 per cent (n = 66). Revision surgery was recommended for a total of 6 cases (9 per cent) including 2 post-operative perforations, 1 case of middle-ear cholesteatoma and 3 cases of external auditory canal scarring. Conclusion Over-under cartilage tympanoplasty is effective at improving clinically meaningful hearing with a low rate of post-operative complications.

Objective: Evaluate whether elevating the tympanic membrane from the malleus during endoscopic tympanoplasty may negatively affect postoperative hearing outcomes or perforation rates by comparing 2 similar endoscopic tympanoplasty techniques. Study Design: Retrospective cohort. Setting: Tertiary care center. Patients: Endoscopic over-under cartilage tympanoplasties age and gender matched to endoscopic underlay cartilage tympanoplasties between January 2015 and January 2019. Exclusion criteria included preoperative or intraoperative cholesteatoma, performance of mastoidectomy or ossicular chain reconstruction, and lack of postoperative audiogram. Interventions: Endoscopic cartilage tympanoplasty via over-under or underlay technique. Main Outcome Measures: Pre- and postoperative pure-tone average and word recognition score, graft success. Results: A total of 52 patients were evaluated: 26 endoscopic over-under cartilage tympanoplasties were matched to endoscopic underlay cartilage tympanoplasties. Both groups demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in air conduction hearing (9 dB [P < 0.001] and 6 dB [P < 0.01], respectively), and bone pure-tone average did not worsen in either group (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05, respectively). Postoperative air conduction pure-tone average was statistically noninferior in the over-under group compared with the underlay group (P < 0.05). Reperforation was present in 3 patients (12%) in the underlay group and none in the over-under group, but this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.24). Conclusions: Endoscopic over-under cartilage tympanoplasty effectively closes tympanic membrane perforations and improves hearing, without greater risk than underlay tympanoplasty. Elevating the tympanic membrane from the malleus does not confer worsen hearing outcomes.