2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2019.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cortical auditory evoked potential in babies and children listeners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study (Table 5) showed that the latency means of the component P1 were within the normality range (between 127 and 151 msec), in agreement with the results of studies conducted earlier (22)(23)(24) , although slightly higher than in other studies, which found, for the same age group, P1 responses between 87 and 126 msec (24,25) . The mean values found for N1 in the present study (between 212 and 243 msec) were also higher than in a previous study with children in the same age group, where the values ranged from 131 to 158 msec (25) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of this study (Table 5) showed that the latency means of the component P1 were within the normality range (between 127 and 151 msec), in agreement with the results of studies conducted earlier (22)(23)(24) , although slightly higher than in other studies, which found, for the same age group, P1 responses between 87 and 126 msec (24,25) . The mean values found for N1 in the present study (between 212 and 243 msec) were also higher than in a previous study with children in the same age group, where the values ranged from 131 to 158 msec (25) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The component P1 of LLAEOs was established as a biological marker to assess maturation of the central auditory system in children for being a robust positive response easily identifiable, which occurs between 100-300 msec after stimulus, depending on the child's age (22)(23)(24) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, it was possible to assess central auditory maturation during the first 3 months of term and preterm infants through CAEP P1 for different tonal stimuli. This potential is a neurophysiological biomarker that is feasible in the study of typical and atypical auditory development in children (7,10,21). A decrease in latency values was observed for all frequencies used to evoke the P1 component from the first to the third month of life in both groups.…”
Section: ' Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Therefore, the electrophysiology of hearing is of great importance in the stages of child development because it allows clinicians to understand and monitor the maturation of auditory structures (7). Although studies of brainstem auditory-evoked potential are of great value for understanding these conditions and providing evidence of differences in the maturational pattern of preterm births (6), the use of long-latency auditory-evoked potential allows the verification of conditions of the central auditory system, making this evaluation an additional tool in the study of auditory maturation.…”
Section: ' Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although CAEP includes P1, N1, and P2 components, N1 and P2 are not considered to be reliable until 7 years of age [2]. The latency of P1 was reported to be measured within 300 milliseconds (ms) in newborns and infants, with a rapid decrease down to 200 ms at 2 years of age and maintained at 100 ms in adulthood [3][4][5]. This change represents the increased speed of synaptic propagation of the central auditory pathways [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%