2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoscopic cartilage tympanoplasty: full thickness and partial thickness tragal graft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 97 per cent closure rate presented compares well to the 84-95 per cent rate in over-under temporalis fascia grafts, [20][21][22] and the rate of 88-98 per cent in other over-under cartilage tympanoplasty procedures. 3,4,6,[11][12][13][14] This was reliable in younger patients as well, though we avoided performing tympanoplasty on young patients with active Eustachian tube dysfunction. The closure rate presented in this article is likely due to the use of cartilage for grafting material, the placing of the graft snugly onto the malleus and the addition of the cartilage shim, which, when required, brings the graft in contact with the native tympanic membrane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The 97 per cent closure rate presented compares well to the 84-95 per cent rate in over-under temporalis fascia grafts, [20][21][22] and the rate of 88-98 per cent in other over-under cartilage tympanoplasty procedures. 3,4,6,[11][12][13][14] This was reliable in younger patients as well, though we avoided performing tympanoplasty on young patients with active Eustachian tube dysfunction. The closure rate presented in this article is likely due to the use of cartilage for grafting material, the placing of the graft snugly onto the malleus and the addition of the cartilage shim, which, when required, brings the graft in contact with the native tympanic membrane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Comparing our findings of high frequency loss to the literature is challenging. Concurrent articles on cartilage tympanoplasty frequently report hearing thresholds or averages using the highest frequency of 2000 Hz, 3,5,13,29 3000 Hz 1 , 8,28,[30][31][32] or 4000 Hz. 2,4,6,12,14,15,[33][34][35][36] Were we to narrow our reporting to these same levels or simply present a pure tone average, the high frequency loss presented here would have been missed, since statistical significance was only noted at 4000, 6000 and 8000 Hz.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The cartilaginous portion of the EAC is often pushed posteriorly using the shaft of the endoscope. Certain techniques such as the Tarabichi's stitch can be used to straighten the EAC and increase the working space for the endoscope [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%