Brainstem auditory evoked potentials with speech stimulus in neonates

Pinto, Elaine Soares Monteiro; Martinelli, Maria Cecília

doi:10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.11.006

Cited by 5 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Included studies were cohort (Jeng, Lin, Chou, et al, 2016;Musacchia et al, 2018Musacchia et al, , 2019Skoe et al, 2015) and crosssectional (Anderson et al, 2015;Ayas et al, 2015;Ferreira et al, 2020;Jeng et al, 2010Jeng et al, , 2011Jeng et al, , 2013Jeng et al, , 2018Pinto & Martinelli, 2018;Ribas-Prats et al, 2019;Van Dyke et al, 2017). Among the included studies, all published between 2010 (Jeng et al, 2010) and 2020 (Ferreira et al, 2020), the majority were originated in the United States (Anderson et al, 2015;Jeng et al, 2010Jeng et al, , 2018Musacchia et al, 2018Musacchia et al, , 2019Skoe et al, 2015;Van Dyke et al, 2017) and China in multicenter collaboration (Jeng et al, 2011(Jeng et al, , 2013Jeng, Lin, Chou, et al, 2016; and some of the studies were also carried out in countries such as Brazil (Ferreira et al, 2020;Pinto & Martinelli, 2018), Spain (Ribas-Prats et al, 2019), and India (Ayas et al, 2015). The year with more publications was 2015 (Anderson et al, 2015;Ayas et al, 2015;Skoe et al, 2015).…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The year with more publications was 2015 (Anderson et al, 2015;Ayas et al, 2015;Skoe et al, 2015). It was found that 14 studies assessed children aged 0-12 months, and of these, nine had included newborns in their samples (Ayas et al, 2015;Jeng et al, 2011Jeng et al, , 2013Jeng et al, , 2018Jeng, Lin, Chou, et al, 2016;Musacchia et al, 2019;Pinto & Martinelli, 2018;Ribas-Prats et al, 2019), resulting in the age group being more most frequently represented in the studies.…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…All studies were able to record FFR in children and showed the feasibility of applying this test for the age group 0-24 months (Anderson et al, 2015;Ayas et al, 2015;Ferreira et al, 2020;Jeng et al, 2010Jeng et al, , 2011Jeng et al, , 2013Jeng et al, , 2018Jeng, Lin, Chou, et al, 2016; Pinto & Martinelli, 2018;Ribas-Prats et al, 2019;Skoe et al, 2015;Van Dyke et al, 2017). Of the 15 studies, only one assessed children over 1 year of age and showed that 2-year-old children are less vulnerable to the disruptive effects of background noise than children under 1 year of age (Musacchia et al, 2018).…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…With regard to the risk of bias in individual studies, the majority were judged to be of low and moderate risk, of which seven were considered to be low risk (Anderson et al, 2015;Ferreira et al, 2020;Jeng et al, 2011;Musacchia et al, 2018Musacchia et al, , 2019Van Dyke et al, 2017); seven, as moderate (Jeng et al, 2010(Jeng et al, , 2013(Jeng et al, , 2018Jeng, Lin, Chou, et al, 2016;Pinto & Martinelli, 2018;Ribas-Prats et al, 2019;Skoe et al, 2015); and one, as high risk of bias (Ayas et al, 2015). More information is provided in Figure 2 and Appendix C. The studies were considered heterogeneous in their methods in relation to the differences in sample size, age of participants, and parameters of acquisition of FFR.…”

Section: Risk Of Bias Within Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition to all its potential clinical applications, FFR can also be used to assess individuals of all age groups, from newborns to older adults (Skoe et al, 2015). Some studies have already shown the feasibility of FFR recordings in young children (Jeng et al, 2010;Van Dyke et al, 2017) and newborns Musacchia et al, 2018Musacchia et al, , 2019Pinto & Martinelli, 2018;Ribas-Prats et al, 2019), including awake children (Anderson et al, 2015;Musacchia et al, 2018;Skoe et al, 2015). A study with 586 subjects characterized functional brainstem development in a comprehensive age group, from 0 to 73 years old, using brainstem auditory evoked potential with click and speech stimuli and found variations in response latencies over life (Skoe et al, 2015).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Frequency-Following Response in Newborns and Infants: A Systematic Review of Acquisition Parameters

Lemos

Nunes

Evangelista

et al. 2021

J Speech Lang Hear Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this study is to characterize parameters used for frequency-following response (FFR) acquisition in children up to 24 months of age through a systematic review. Method The study was registered in PROSPERO and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses' recommendations. Search was performed in six databases (LILACS, LIVIVO, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) and gray literature (Google Scholar, OpenGrey, ProQuest)as well as via manual searches in bibliographic references. Observational studies using speech stimuli to elicit the FFR in infants with normal hearing on the age range from 0 until 24 months were included. No restrictions regarding language and year of publication were applied. Risk of bias was assessed with the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist. Data on stimulus, presentation rate, time window for analysis, number of sweeps, artifact rejection, online filters, stimulated ear, and examination condition were extracted. Results Four hundred fifty-nine studies were identified. After removing duplicates and reading titles and abstracts, 15 articles were included. Seven studies were classified as low risk of bias, seven as moderate risk, and one as high risk. Conclusions There is a consensus in the use of some acquisition parameters of the FFR with speech stimulus, such as the vertical mounting, the use of alternating polarity, a sampling rate of 20000 Hz, and the /da/ synthesized syllable of 40 ms in duration as the preferred stimulus. Although these parameters show some consensus, the results disclosed lack of a single established protocol for FFR acquisition with speech stimulus in infants in the investigated age range.

show abstract

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Risk Of Bias Within Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Frequency-Following Response in Newborns and Infants: A Systematic Review of Acquisition Parameters

Lemos

Nunes

Evangelista

et al. 2021

J Speech Lang Hear Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Speech auditory brainstem response in audiological practice: a systematic review

Başöz

Guler

Kuru

et al. 2023

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Neural encoding of voice pitch and formant structure at birth as revealed by frequency-following responses

Arenillas-Alcón

Costa‐Faidella

Ribas-Prats

et al. 2021

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Detailed neural encoding of voice pitch and formant structure plays a crucial role in speech perception, and is of key importance for an appropriate acquisition of the phonetic repertoire in infants since birth. However, the extent to what newborns are capable of extracting pitch and formant structure information from the temporal envelope and the temporal fine structure of speech sounds, respectively, remains unclear. Here, we recorded the frequency-following response (FFR) elicited by a novel two-vowel, rising-pitch-ending stimulus to simultaneously characterize voice pitch and formant structure encoding accuracy in a sample of neonates and adults. Data revealed that newborns tracked changes in voice pitch reliably and no differently than adults, but exhibited weaker signatures of formant structure encoding, particularly at higher formant frequency ranges. Thus, our results indicate a well-developed encoding of voice pitch at birth, while formant structure representation is maturing in a frequency-dependent manner. Furthermore, we demonstrate the feasibility to assess voice pitch and formant structure encoding within clinical evaluation times in a hospital setting, and suggest the possibility to use this novel stimulus as a tool for longitudinal developmental studies of the auditory system.

show abstract

Brainstem auditory evoked potentials with speech stimulus in neonates

Cited by 5 publications

References 27 publications

Frequency-Following Response in Newborns and Infants: A Systematic Review of Acquisition Parameters

Frequency-Following Response in Newborns and Infants: A Systematic Review of Acquisition Parameters

Speech auditory brainstem response in audiological practice: a systematic review

Neural encoding of voice pitch and formant structure at birth as revealed by frequency-following responses

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About