2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of hearing threshold in adults with hearing loss using an automated system of cortical auditory evoked potential detection

Abstract: The cortical electrophysiological thresholds obtained with the use of an automated response detection system were highly correlated with behavioral thresholds in the group of individuals with hearing loss.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
16
2
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
16
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The exception in the present study was the fact that CATE thresholds at 2000 Hz were, on average, 9.5 dB better than the behavioural thresholds at that frequency. This is not consistent with the studies by Durante et al (2016) and Van Dun et al 2015, who used the HEARLab® in typical adults and older adults and found cortical thresholds were worse than behavioural thresholds at all frequencies.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The exception in the present study was the fact that CATE thresholds at 2000 Hz were, on average, 9.5 dB better than the behavioural thresholds at that frequency. This is not consistent with the studies by Durante et al (2016) and Van Dun et al 2015, who used the HEARLab® in typical adults and older adults and found cortical thresholds were worse than behavioural thresholds at all frequencies.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 92%
“…Overall, the correlations found in this study between CATE and PTA are similar to other studies that have used AEPs with adults who do not have a cognitive impairment (Durante et al, 2016;Lightfoot & Kennedy, 2006;Tsui, Wong, & Wong, 2002;Van Dun, Dillon, & Seeto, 2015). Typically, after applying correction factors, cortical thresholds are within 10 dB of behavioural thresholds across all frequencies and the trend is for cortical thresholds to be slightly worse than behavioural thresholds.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Further tests have shown that both the amplitude and latency of the P1 CAEP component were correlated with speech perception in adults and children 5 , 8 10 . Beyond the examination of functional hearing in healthy subjects, CAEPs have also been used to assess hearing loss 11 and the function of cochlear implants and hearing aids. Recent research suggests that CAEPs may further serve as objective tools to aid in the assessment and programming of Cochlear implants 12 , with later experiments revealing correlations between CAEP scores and Mandarin Early Speech Perception tests in children after cochlear implantation surgery 13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CAEPs have advantages over other electrophysiological measures, such as auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) and auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs). First, the CAEP is a measure of cortical function, whereas the ABR and high modulation ASSR only provide information at the brainstem [1,2]. Second, the amplitude of CAEPs is larger than the ABR and ASSR by about 5 to 10 µV because CAEPs occur closer to the electrodes [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CAEP is affected by the patient's state of arousal, so drowsiness and sleep can affect the responses [13]. The CAEP latency, amplitude, and morphology can vary across age, individuals, and even from time to time within the same person [1]. Other drawbacks include the long time that CAEPs take with standard evoked potential software [4], the high cost of equipment [14], and the absence of a user-friendly system designed for routine clinical practice; all have hindered the regular use of CAEPs [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%