2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjid.2021.101570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of COVID-19 outbreak management in a skilled nursing facility based on serial testing for early detection and control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our finding that staff at site A had high preexisting seroprevalence (>40%) prior to intensive monitoring suggests this facility experienced a prior outbreak and had a level of immunity that limited spread of the virus from the two positive staff members ( 45 ). It is possible that other control measures and policies instituted at the time of monitoring, such as negative pressure isolation space ( 46 ), surveillance and monitoring systems, quarantine of positive staff ( 40 , 47 49 ), environmental cleaning ( 50 , 51 ), and other measures ( 52 ) additionally contributed to protection against outbreaks. It is notable that at both sites, seroprevalence reached a maximum of 40% during the study period, suggesting this might correspond to a level of naturally acquired immunity when coupled with other preventative measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our finding that staff at site A had high preexisting seroprevalence (>40%) prior to intensive monitoring suggests this facility experienced a prior outbreak and had a level of immunity that limited spread of the virus from the two positive staff members ( 45 ). It is possible that other control measures and policies instituted at the time of monitoring, such as negative pressure isolation space ( 46 ), surveillance and monitoring systems, quarantine of positive staff ( 40 , 47 49 ), environmental cleaning ( 50 , 51 ), and other measures ( 52 ) additionally contributed to protection against outbreaks. It is notable that at both sites, seroprevalence reached a maximum of 40% during the study period, suggesting this might correspond to a level of naturally acquired immunity when coupled with other preventative measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, in many facilities, only individuals with COVID-like symptoms were tested, due to limited testing resources. However, several studies show that screening symptomatic cases only is not enough to control outbreaks [33,16,17]. Starting in March 2020, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) offered various COVID-19 surveillance testing strategies to hospitals, nursing homes, schools, and other facilities, as the pandemic progressed.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from suggestions provided by the government, managers and researchers in various facilities developed their own surveillance testing strategies, combined with contact interventions, based on the facility's contact patterns and healthcare resources. In LTCs for example, the strategies include daily individual health screening via surveys or front desk checks [3,16], daily temperature and oxygen level checks [33], serological anti-body checks [31], and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further recommendation was for asymptomatic healthcare personnel to be tested after exposure to a SARS‐CoV‐2‐positive individual and to self‐isolate for 14 days following the exposure 8 . Multiple NHs were able to keep outbreaks under control with serial testing of residents and staff 9–15 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Multiple NHs were able to keep outbreaks under control with serial testing of residents and staff. 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%