nd years of second ratoon cane crop, by means of adapted curves. The research was performed in Morro Agudo, SP, Brazil from July 1995 to July 1997. The cultivar was the SP 70 -1143. As growth indicators the following biometric indexes were used: number of tillers, number of leaves, dry matter of stalks, and leaves and leaf area index (LAI). For each treatment, 4 areas were used, each one being considered a replication. Polynomial regression and non-linear regression were used to adjust the data to the growth curves. The growth in the first cycle was similar for the green and the burned canes. At the beginning of the second cycle the green cane growth was greater, while at the end, the growth was greater for the burned cane. Tillering of the green cane did not present significant differences that confirm the negative influence of the straw in the ratoon cane crop. The climatological factors, separately, did not promote changes in the growth cycles, that could identify a general tendency. The differences in the development expressed on the curve of growth from the 1 st to the 2 nd year are due to the climatological factors, for both, the green and the burned cane. Key words: sugarcane, ecophysiology, burned, environmental impact INTRODUÇÃO A produção de cana-de-açúcar tem sido muito incrementada no Brasil para a fabricação de açúcar, mas principalmente para obtenção de álcool, ao mesmo tempo que continua aumentando a área plantada. Esse aumento gera maior gama de questões a serem respondidas na cultura da cana-de-açúcar. Entre elas, há a influência sobre a produtividade e sobre o impacto ambiental, causados pela queima da cana. Em cidades que são circundadas por canaviais, foi estabelecido o decreto 28.895/88 que proibiu a queima de cana-de-açúcar em um raio inferior a 1 km em torno da zona urbana.Furlani Neto (1994) ao comparar cana crua e cana queimada destaca como vantagens da primeira: maior proteção do solo contra erosão, redução do uso de herbicidas, melhor matéria-prima para indústria, maior incorporação