2022
DOI: 10.1002/pits.22713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Australian teacher stress, well‐being, self‐efficacy, and safety during the COVID‐19 pandemic

Abstract: The 2020 COVID pandemic radically altered the way in which individuals live and work. For teachers, this entailed a shift in their teaching practice, with large numbers of schools around Australia and the world closing for prolonged periods of time and moving to an “online” format. This required teachers to quickly adapt their teaching practices adding further stress to an already stressful environment. In this article, we examine the relationships between teachers' stress, teachers' self‐efficacy, and teacher… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was assumed that such positive changes were initially associated with the period of adaptation and the disorganization of the university's online educational services. The workload on the teaching staff has especially increased, as follows: (1) adaptation to new methods of teaching and assessing students, (2) mastering electronic gadgets, (3) increasing the scope of checking written works and constantly checking them for anti-plagiarism, (4) the severity of evaluating practical and communication skills, and (5), because some teachers joined the front line in the fight against COVID-19, the hourly workload on the remaining teachers increased (Johnson and Coleman, 2021;Lizana et al, 2021;Billett et al, 2022;Rǎducu and Stanculescu, 2022;Westphal et al, 2022;Klusmann et al, 2023). On the other hand, stressors were also observed among students through (1) buying the necessary gadgets to participate in classes and (2) adapting to new learning environments and technologies (O'Byrne et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was assumed that such positive changes were initially associated with the period of adaptation and the disorganization of the university's online educational services. The workload on the teaching staff has especially increased, as follows: (1) adaptation to new methods of teaching and assessing students, (2) mastering electronic gadgets, (3) increasing the scope of checking written works and constantly checking them for anti-plagiarism, (4) the severity of evaluating practical and communication skills, and (5), because some teachers joined the front line in the fight against COVID-19, the hourly workload on the remaining teachers increased (Johnson and Coleman, 2021;Lizana et al, 2021;Billett et al, 2022;Rǎducu and Stanculescu, 2022;Westphal et al, 2022;Klusmann et al, 2023). On the other hand, stressors were also observed among students through (1) buying the necessary gadgets to participate in classes and (2) adapting to new learning environments and technologies (O'Byrne et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While not wishing to downplay the pressure that this requirement put on principals and their school leadership teams, our focus in this article is on teachers as frontline workers ( Beames, Christensen, & Werner-Seidler, 2021 ; Pressley, Ha, & Learn, 2021 ), that is, those who were charged with teaching on a daily basis. Studies of teachers early in the pandemic reveal high levels of uncertainty, anxiety and frustration ( Allen, Jerrim, & Sims, 2020 ; Beames et al, 2021 ; Billett, Turner, & Li, 2022 ; Education Review Office, 2021 ; Kim & Asbury, 2020 ; Mutch & Peung, 2021 ; Pressley et al, 2021 ). In later studies, some of these intense emotions appeared to level out as schools and parents reduced expectations and teachers settled into a delivery rhythm ( Kim & Asbury, 2020 ; Sharma et al, 2022 ) but exhaustion increased, and mental health and physical wellbeing decreased ( Beames et al, 2021 ; Education Review Office, 2021 ; Kim et al, 2022 ; Letzel, Pozas, & Schneider, 2020 ; Mutch & Peung, 2021 ; Pellerone, 2021 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1–16; Kim & Asbury, 2020 ; Maitland & Glazzard, 2022 ). As well as the intensity of learning about new pedagogies and platforms, teachers faced limited preparation time, a lack of suitable resources, increased workload, guilt about the quality of their teaching, and the loss of their former teacher identity ( Billett, Turner, & Li, 2022 ; Flack, Walker, Bickerstaff, & Margetts, 2020 ; Hood, 2020 ; Kim et al, 2022 ; Leech et al, 2020 ; Letzel et al, 2020 ; Mutch and Peung, 2021 ; Van Bergen & Daniel, 2022 ; Weißenfels, Klopp, & Perels, 2022 ; Marshall et al, 2020 ). Many teachers missed the face-to-face interactions of teaching, the buzz of a busy classroom, and their individual students ( Leech et al, 2020 ; Letzel et al, 2020 ; Truzoli, Pirola, & Conte, 2021 ; Van Bergen & Daniel, 2020 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In comparison with other at-risk groups, such as healthcare workers and youngsters, research on mental health of teachers during the pandemic is scarce. Previous studies focusing on mental health in teachers during the pandemic mainly used a cross-sectional design (10,(27)(28)(29)(30)(31), and thus precluding comparison with data collected prior to the pandemic. In general, these studies found increased levels of depression, anxiety and high levels of stress during the pandemic (27,(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%