Rhythm in Cognition and Grammar 2015
DOI: 10.1515/9783110378092.255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

10 Function words in rhythmic optimisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the determiner inversion in Schlüter 2005; Kentner 2018) or possibly involve stylistic mannerisms (e.g. the verb cluster ordering reported in Vogel et al 2015). The syntax appears to be indifferent to at least some of these word order alternations: For example, determiner inversion engenders split constituents (quite a long report ∼ [a [[quite long] report]]) and thus violates rules concerning phrasal integrity.…”
Section: Lack Of Rhythmic Effect On Dass-mention: Potential Reasons Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the determiner inversion in Schlüter 2005; Kentner 2018) or possibly involve stylistic mannerisms (e.g. the verb cluster ordering reported in Vogel et al 2015). The syntax appears to be indifferent to at least some of these word order alternations: For example, determiner inversion engenders split constituents (quite a long report ∼ [a [[quite long] report]]) and thus violates rules concerning phrasal integrity.…”
Section: Lack Of Rhythmic Effect On Dass-mention: Potential Reasons Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(dysrhythmic) there wanted the Peter in tomatoes cook 'Peter wanted to cook tomatoes in there.' For example, Vogel et al (2015) find that the syntactic placement of an inherently unaccented pronominal adverb drin 'in' (bolded in (2)) is conditioned by the prosodic structure of the immediate environment, suggesting that speakers favour rhythmic (here: dactylic) linearisations like (2a) over adverb placements which would lead to dysrhythmic word orders (2b), i.e. those in which the alternation between stressed and unstressed syllables is less regular.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, interlexical stress patterns in word combinations also negatively affect inter-stress interval (ISI) variance, suggesting preference for alternation post-lexically. Vogel et al (2015) found that reduced and unreduced variants of the German pronoun es are not randomly distributed but rather the choice between them depends on rhythmic context. Also, they found an interaction of syntactic and rhythmic preferences in a sentence reproduction task, where some syntactic structures are actively avoided if rhythmically irregular.…”
Section: How Regular Do These Repeating Structures Need To Be?mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Also, they found an interaction of syntactic and rhythmic preferences in a sentence reproduction task, where some syntactic structures are actively avoided if rhythmically irregular. This evidence led them to suggest 'rhythmic regularity' as a syntactic constraint (Vogel et al, 2015).…”
Section: How Regular Do These Repeating Structures Need To Be?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal prosodic structure of phrases and sentences in German and other languages builds up a strong-weak rhythm ( Liberman and Prince, 1977 ; Vogel et al, 2015 ). Although violations of this Rhythm Rule do occur frequently in spoken German, they still have behavioral as well as electrophysiological consequences (e.g., Bohn et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%