Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Abstract. (1) One hundred and two plants were offered to locust nymphs after a 5 h period without food. Large meals were only taken on grasses and on Juncus. Most dicotyledons were totally rejected.(2) All the plants which were relatively unpalatable yielded an extract which reduced the amount eaten, but no inhibition of feeding was induced by extracts of plants which were freely eaten. Very few of the extracts increased the amount eaten.(3) Over 100 chemicals, mostly non‐nutritional, known to occur in leaves, were tested for their inhibitory effect on feeding. Some had no effect, but most progressively inhibited feeding as their concentration was increased until no feeding at all occurred. Chemicals of many classes had this effect, but alkaloids and monoterpenoids were the most consistently deterrent at the lowest concentrations.(4) It is concluded that the failure to eat most plants results from the presence in the leaves of one or more chemicals in amounts which inhibit feeding. Grasses and a few other plants are readily acceptable because they do not contain deterrent chemicals in sufficient quantity to limit feeding.
Abstract. (1) One hundred and two plants were offered to locust nymphs after a 5 h period without food. Large meals were only taken on grasses and on Juncus. Most dicotyledons were totally rejected.(2) All the plants which were relatively unpalatable yielded an extract which reduced the amount eaten, but no inhibition of feeding was induced by extracts of plants which were freely eaten. Very few of the extracts increased the amount eaten.(3) Over 100 chemicals, mostly non‐nutritional, known to occur in leaves, were tested for their inhibitory effect on feeding. Some had no effect, but most progressively inhibited feeding as their concentration was increased until no feeding at all occurred. Chemicals of many classes had this effect, but alkaloids and monoterpenoids were the most consistently deterrent at the lowest concentrations.(4) It is concluded that the failure to eat most plants results from the presence in the leaves of one or more chemicals in amounts which inhibit feeding. Grasses and a few other plants are readily acceptable because they do not contain deterrent chemicals in sufficient quantity to limit feeding.
Salivary secretions play critical roles in aphid-host plant interactions and are responsible for damage associated with aphid feeding. The objectives of this study were to evaluate aspects of salivation and the salivary constituents of Diuraphis noxia (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Salivary proteins were isolated and compared from three aphid probed diets: pure water, 15% sucrose, or amino acids (100 mM serine, 100 mM methionine, 100 mM aspartic acid, and 15% sucrose). After 6 h, more aphids settled on sucrose diet compared with other diets, but there were no significant differences in the number of stylet sheaths produced per aphid after 24 h. There were differences in the amount of soluble salivary protein (watery saliva), with the greatest amount secreted in sucrose diet, followed by amino acid diet and pure water, respectively. Protein constituents secreted into sucrose and amino acid diets were compared using gel electrophoresis using standardized amounts of protein. More protein bands and bands of greater intensity were visualized from probed sucrose diet compared with probed amino acid diet, indicating qualitative differences. Phosphatase was putatively identified from D. noxia saliva from a major protein band using gel electrophoresis and mass spectrophotometry. Alkaline phosphatase activity was confirmed in sucrose diet using enzymatic assays but was not detected in aphid probed water or amino acid diets. Other peptides in sucrose diet weakly but significantly showed similarities to putative dehydrogenase and RNA helicase expressed sequence tags identified from other aphids. The implications of these findings in aphid salivation and plant-insect interactions are discussed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.