No abstract

No abstract

Introduction.Acute appendicitis takes the first place in incidence among acute surgical disorders of the abdominal cavity organs. While many issues of the diagnosis and treatment strategy of this disease have been studied in detail, the diagnosis of acute appendicitis remains primarily a matter of clinical presentation. National guidelines on acute appendicitis also recommend additional methods for a number of stipulated situations; these methods include the Alvarado score. The key goal of this study is to analyse the results of using the Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and juxtaposing these results with the laparoscopic and pathomorphological data.Materials and methods.This non-randomised prospective study presents the analysis of examination and treatment of 4,941 patients with acute appendicitis from the two periods — from 2006 to 2010 and from 2011 to 2015 — which is before and after the Alvarado score was introduced into the examination protocol. The likelihood of acute appendicitis according to the Alvarado score is evaluated as follows. A score of one to four is interpreted as appendicitis is unlikely; a score of five or six — acute appendicitis is possible, further dynamic observation is required; a score of seven to ten indicates a most probable acute appendicitis.Results and discussion.The total sensitivity of the scoring system exceeded 90%; however, it did not result in a reduction of the number of diagnostic laparoscopies.Conclusion. The authors see as the upsides of the use of the Alvarado score the improvement of the diagnostic precision and the reduced incidence of catarrhal appendicitis (down to 0.1%) and gangrenous forms of appendicitis (from 14.6% to 8.9%) due to a shorter observation period. The authors explain the failure to achieve the result planned by the healthcare funding costs and the drive to obtain a more precise diagnosis.

An analysis of application results of complex research methods of diagnostics of intraorganic hepatic and splenic hematomas was made. At the same time, options of these methods were used for determination of prescription of injury. The ultrasound, CT, MR-imaging, videolaparoscopy, angiography, Doppler ultrasonics, impedometry, biochemical, laboratory and cytological study of punctate sample from hematomas were applied for this purpose in 33 patients. According to authors, an evolution of hematomas happened in 3 stages, each of this stage was characterized by specified data associated with investigation results. The staging procedure of hematomas or their evolution allowed setting the prescription of injury.

No abstract

No abstract

Creative surgery and oncologyСreative surgery and oncology. 2017;7(3): нарушений органов брюшной полости, а также лактата как маркера ишемии проведено моделирование абдоминального компартмент-синдрома путем напряженного пневмоперитонеума под давлением 20 мм рт.ст. в течение двух часов на 5 свиньях массой 60-70 кг и на 7 поросятах массой 8-10 кг. Предложен алгоритм диагностики в до -и послеоперационном периодах.Результаты. Установлено, что современные лабораторные (уровень лактата) и инструментальные (эндоскопические, ультразвуковые, рентгеноконтрастные, лазерная флоуметрия и др.) методы позволяют с точностью >90% диагностировать ишемические нарушения кишечника.Заключение. Для контроля состояния кишечника и зоны анастомозов рекомендовано использовать методику программированной фибролапароскопии через контрольный дренаж брюшной полости.Ключевые слова: ишемия, реперфузионные повреждения, кишечная непроходимость, лабораторная диагностика, эндоскопия, ультрасонография, анастомоз хирургический

No abstract