Hepatitis C virus (HCV) evolution is thought to proceed by mutations within the six genotypes. Here, we report on a viable spontaneous HCV recombinant and we show that recombination may play a role in the evolution of this virus. Previously, 149 HCV strains from St. Petersburg had been subtyped by limited sequencing within the NS5B region. In the present study, the core regions of 41 of these strains were sequenced to investigate the concordance of HCV genotyping for these two genomic regions. Two phylogenetically related HCV strains were found to belong to different subtypes, 2k and 1b, according to sequence analysis of the 5 untranslated region (5UTR)-core and the NS5B regions, respectively. By sequencing of the E2-p7-NS2 region, the crossover point was mapped within the NS2 region, probably between positions 3175 and 3176 (according to the numbering system for strain pj6CF). Sequencing of the 5UTR-core regions of four other HCV strains, phylogenetically related to the above-mentioned two strains (based on analysis within the NS5B region), revealed that these four strains were also recombinants. Since a nonrecombinant 2k strain was found in St. Petersburg, the recombination may have taken place there around a decade ago. Since the frequency of this recombinant is now high enough to allow the detection of the recombinant in a fraction of the city's population, it seems to be actively spreading there. The reported recombinant is tentatively designated RF1_2k/1b, in agreement with the nomenclature used for HIV recombinants. Recombination between HCV genotypes must now be considered in the classification, laboratory diagnosis, and treatment of HCV infection.Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the major agent of parenterally transmitted non-A, non-B hepatitis worldwide (1). HCV is an enveloped virus classified in the family Flaviviridae. It has a single-stranded, positive-sense, nonsegmented RNA genome of approximately 9,500 nucleotides (nt) with a single, long open reading frame encoding a polyprotein of ϳ3,030 amino acids with the gene order C-E1-E2-p7-NS2-NS3-NS4A-NS4B-NS5A-NS5B. The structural proteins are C (core) and E1 and E2 (envelope glycoproteins). The function of the p7 gene product is presently unknown. The NS2 through NS5 regions encode putative nonstructural proteins (2).HCV is characterized by a high degree of genetic heterogeneity. Its variability is, however, distributed unequally within the genome, and some regions, such as NS3 and NS5B, are considerably conserved. HCV is classified into six genotypes and an increasing number of subtypes based on degree of genomic sequence divergence (26,27). Evolution of HCV is believed to be mediated by point, insertion, or deletion mutations. Another mechanism for viral evolution is through recombination. There has so far been little evidence of recombination between HCV strains of different genotypes (38), and it has been suggested that these events are rare in vivo and that the resultant recombinants are usually not viable (26,28,34).Relatively short subgenomic region...

The genotypes of 149 HCV strains from St. Petersburg were determined by limited sequencing and phylogenetic analysis within the NS5B region. One hundred two strains derived from patients that attended infectious disease clinics, of whom 48 admitted injecting drug use, and 47 derived from dialysis patients. Subtype 3a was predominant in the patients from infectious disease clinics, both in patients that admitted injecting drug use (56%) and in those with unknown source of infection (46%). However, 89% of the strains from dialysis patients belonged to subtype 1b. Eleven of twelve characterised strains from recent cases of hepatitis C at these units were at phylogenetic analysis shown to be related to strains already circulating there, demonstrating that within the dialysis units nosocomial transmission is the most important route of HCV infection. The predominance of subtype 1b strains in dialysis patients indicates that these strains have been circulating for a long time in dialysis units. The predominance of subtype 3a also among patients who did not admit drug use and that their strains were intermixed with the strains from injecting drug users in the phylogenetic analysis shows that the increase in injecting drug use is the major factor that explains the recent spread of HCV in the St. Petersburg population. This supports the concept that injecting drug use remains the major route for HCV infection in developed countries and that the control of drug abuse is the most important measure to prevent its spread.

Complete or almost complete hepatitis B virus (HBV) genomes were sequenced for 13 genotype A and 42 genotype D strains from the former USSR. The strains were classifiable within subgenotypes A2, D1, D2 and D3. Comparison of the deduced gene products for the four ORFs of 89 genotype D strains revealed 27 subgenotype-specific residues, and a region spanning residues 58-128 in the spacer region of the P gene could be used to distinguish between D1 and D4. This enabled the allocation to subgenotype of strains with partially sequenced genomes. D2 was dominating, while D3 was found in low frequency in the whole region. D1 was most prevalent in the Middle Asian Republics. Mean inter-subgenotype divergences between D1 and D2, D1 and D3 and D2 and D3 were 2.7, 3.4 and 3.4 %, respectively. The intra-subgenotype divergence was 0.4, 1.1, 1.0 and 1.8 % for A2, D1, D2 and D3, respectively. All D1 and D3 strains encoded subtype ayw2, whereas most D2 strains encoded ayw3. Two D2 strains encoded ayw4. Strains with identical S genes were closely related at the level of complete genomes and formed geographically specific clades with low intraclade divergences, possibly indicating past iatrogenic spread. It is not clear whether the finding of four subgenotypes in the area corresponds to separate introductions of the virus or to previous population migrations into the area. An earlier introduction of D3 compared with D2 was supported by its higher intra-subgenotype divergence, while the lower divergence within D1 is probably due to a more recent emergence.

The genotypes and subtypes of 205 HBV isolates collected during 1989-2002 in Estonia and 14 other regions of the former USSR were determined by sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of the S gene. The in Europe prevailing genotypes, A and D, were also circulating in the whole territory of the former USSR including Estonia and accounted for 18.5 and 81% of the strains, respectively. All genotype A strains specified adw2, and a single genotype C strain specified adrq+. Most genotype D strains specified ayw3 and ayw2, although, three strains from Estonia and Siberia specified ayw4. Due to unique substitutions, Ser122 and Ala127, four strains could not be classified according to the subtype. One strain specifying ayw3 encoded Leu143 and Ala145 and was possibly an immune "escape" mutant. At phylogenetic analysis 93% of the Estonian genotype D strains belonged to a cluster specifying mainly ayw3 and were more similar to isolates from Siberia and the Far-East of Russia than to isolates originating from Central Russia which belonged to another cluster of strains specifying mainly ayw2. This pattern might be explained by part of the Estonian population, has roots east of European Russia, based on linguistic evidence. Eight dominant HBV strains represented by identical S gene sequences were identified, one within genotype A and seven within genotype D, three of which included isolates from Estonia and Siberia. Some of these strains were collected over a period of at least 13 years indicating there are genetically stable variants of HBV that remain conserved over decades.

The genotypes of 149 HCV strains from St. Petersburg were determined by limited sequencing and phylogenetic analysis within the NS5B region. One hundred two strains derived from patients that attended infectious disease clinics, of whom 48 admitted injecting drug use, and 47 derived from dialysis patients. Subtype 3a was predominant in the patients from infectious disease clinics, both in patients that admitted injecting drug use (56%) and in those with unknown source of infection (46%). However, 89% of the strains from dialysis patients belonged to subtype 1b. Eleven of twelve characterised strains from recent cases of hepatitis C at these units were at phylogenetic analysis shown to be related to strains already circulating there, demonstrating that within the dialysis units nosocomial transmission is the most important route of HCV infection. The predominance of subtype 1b strains in dialysis patients indicates that these strains have been circulating for a long time in dialysis units. The predominance of subtype 3a also among patients who did not admit drug use and that their strains were intermixed with the strains from injecting drug users in the phylogenetic analysis shows that the increase in injecting drug use is the major factor that explains the recent spread of HCV in the St. Petersburg population. This supports the concept that injecting drug use remains the major route for HCV infection in developed countries and that the control of drug abuse is the most important measure to prevent its spread.