The suppressor of Hairy wing (su(Hw)) protein inhibits the function of transcriptional enhancers located distally from the promoter with respect to the location of su(Hw)-binding sites. This polarity is due to the ability of the su(Hw)-binding region to form a chromatin insulator. Mutations in modifier of mdg4 (mod(mdg4)) enhance the effect of su(Hw) by inhibiting the function of enhancers located on both sides of the su(Hw)-binding region. This inhibition results in a variegated expression pattern, and mutations in mod(mdg4) act as classical enhancers of position-effect variegation. The mod(mdg4) and su(Hw) proteins interact with each other. The mod(mdg4) protein controls the nature of the repressive effect of su(Hw): in the absence of mod(mdg4) protein, su(Hw) exerts a bidirectional silencing effect, whereas in the presence of mod(mdg4), the silencing effect is transformed into unidirectional repression.

The Drosophila TATA box-binding protein (TBP)-related factor 2 (TRF2 or TLF) was shown to control a subset of genes different from that controlled by TBP. Here, we have investigated the structure and functions of the trf2 gene. We demonstrate that it encodes two protein isoforms: the previously described 75-kDa TRF2 and a newly identified 175-kDa version in which the same sequence is preceded by a long N-terminal domain with coiled-coil motifs. Chromatography of Drosophila embryo extracts revealed that the long TRF2 is part of a multiprotein complex also containing ISWI. Both TRF2 forms are detected at the same sites on polytene chromosomes and have the same expression patterns, suggesting that they fulfill similar functions. A study of the manifestations of the trf2 mutation suggests an essential role of TRF2 during embryonic Drosophila development. The trf2 gene is strongly expressed in germ line cells of adult flies. High levels of TRF2 are found in nuclei of primary spermatocytes and trophocytes with intense transcription. In ovaries, TRF2 is present both in actively transcribing nurse cells and in the transcriptionally inactive oocyte nuclei. Moreover, TRF2 is essential for premeiotic chromatin condensation and proper differentiation of germ cells of both sexes.To initiate transcription, each eukaryotic RNA polymerase requires a set of general transcription factors. TFIID, composed of the TATA box-binding protein (TBP) and TBP-associated factors (TAFs), recognizes the core promoter in a sequence-specific manner and is thought to be the only sequence-specific factor that operates with RNA polymerase II (4, 51). The C-terminal core domain of TBP is highly conserved among eukaryotes and contains two symmetrical repeats that fold into a saddle-like structure essential for interaction with the promoter sequences (24,25).A second gene encoding a protein with high homology to the core domain of TBP, TBP-like factor (TLF; also called TRF2 or TLP), was detected in metazoan species (11,23,30,34,38,39,40,41,52). Like TBP, most members of the TLF family have a bipartite structure with a variable N-terminal domain and the highly conserved C-terminal core domain containing two direct repeats (11). TLF was shown to mediate polymerase II transcription initiation and to interact with TFIIA and TFIIB to form a preinitiation complex. However, TLF does not bind to the classical TATA box elements and has been shown to control a set of genes different from those controlled by TBP (12,34,40,41,45,50).Sequence comparison of core domains in the TLF family reveals that they are less conserved in evolution (40 to 45% identity among the metazoan species) than the TBP core domains (about 80% identity between yeast and humans). Thus, while the role of TBP is similar in different species, the function of TLF may have evolved into different regulatory pathways in evolutionarily distant species (11). Studies on the physiological function of TLF in Caenorhabditis elegans, Xenopus laevis, and Danio rerio have demonstrated that TLF is essenti...

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor is essential for biological responses to endogenous and exogenous toxins in mammals. Its Drosophila homolog spineless plays an important role in fly morphogenesis. We have previously shown that during morphogenesis spineless genetically interacts with CG5017 gene, which encodes a nucleosome assembly factor and may affect cognitive function of the fly. We now demonstrate synergistic interactions of spineless and CG5017 in pathways controlling oxidative stress response and long-term memory formation in Drosophila melanogaster. Oxidative stress was induced by low doses of X-ray irradiation of flies carrying hypomorphic mutation of spineless, mutation of CG5017, and their combination. To determine the sensitivity of these mutants to pharmacological modifiers of the irradiation effect, we irradiated flies growing on standard medium supplemented by radiosensitizer furazidin and radioprotector serotonin. The effects of irradiation were investigated by analyzing leg and antenna morphological structures and by using real-time PCR to measure mRNA expression levels for spineless, Cyp6g1 and Gst-theta genes. We also examined long-term memory in these mutants using conditioned courtship suppression paradigm. Our results show that the interaction of spineless and CG5017 is important for regulation of morphogenesis, long-term memory formation, and detoxification during oxidative stress. Since spineless and CG5017 are evolutionary conserved, these results must be considered when evaluating the risk of combining similar mutations in other organisms, including humans.

Crosses between the Drosophila melanogaster y2sc1waG strain or some of its derivatives and the FM4 strain yielded insertional mutagenesis with a frequency of 10(‐3)‐10(‐4). The system differs in several respects from the known cases of hybrid dysgenesis: (i) it does not depend on the direction of a cross; (ii) destabilization continues for a long time after initial crosses; (iii) mutations may occur at different stages of development. The mutation in the yellow locus has been cloned and found to depend on insertion into the coding region of the gene of a novel mobile genetic element designated as Stalker. The sequencing of Stalker termini reveals 405 bp direct repeats (LTRs) and a target 3 bp duplication, as well as some other sequences typical of retrovirus‐like retrotransposons. The number of Stalker copies per genome and chromosomal localization vary among D. melanogaster strains. Before crosses, the location of Stalker on chromosomes is fairly stable in a particular strain but thereafter numerous changes in Stalker distribution take place. Most novel substrains are internally heterogenous which is indicative of the continuing Stalker transposition. Other mobile elements tested do not move. Possibly, only Stalker is mobilized in the system. Many known and novel mutations have been obtained. Comparison of their genetic localization with Stalker distribution suggests that the majority of them have been induced by the Stalker insertion.

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) is the key transcription factor that controls animal development and various adaptive processes. The AHR’s target genes are involved in biodegradation of endogenous and exogenous toxins, regulation of immune response, organogenesis, and neurogenesis. Ligand binding is important for the activation of the AHR signaling pathway. Invertebrate AHR homologs are activated by endogenous ligands whereas vertebrate AHR can be activated by both endogenous and exogenous ligands (xenobiotics). Several studies using mammalian cultured cells have demonstrated that transcription of the AHR target genes can be activated by exogenous AHR ligands, but little is known about the effects of AHR in a living organism. Here, we examined the effects of human AHR and its ligands using transgenic Drosophila lines with an inducible human AhR gene. We found that exogenous AHR ligands can increase as well as decrease the transcription levels of the AHR target genes, including genes that control proliferation, motility, polarization, and programmed cell death. This suggests that AHR activation may affect the expression of gene networks that could be critical for cancer progression and metastasis. Importantly, we found that AHR target genes are also controlled by the enzymes that modify chromatin structure, in particular components of the epigenetic Polycomb Repressive complexes 1 and 2. Since exogenous AHR ligands (alternatively – xenobiotics) and small molecule inhibitors of epigenetic modifiers are often used as pharmaceutical anticancer drugs, our findings may have significant implications in designing new combinations of therapeutic treatments for oncological diseases.