The article considers the problem of the development of shields, the main element of medieval protective equipment, and an important military and heraldic symbol in Ukrainian medieval state of Rus’ and in Europe in general. The state of the research and the source base are outlined. The main trends in the development of the design and symbolic significance of shields in Europe during the Middle Ages are outlined. At the same time, emphasis was placed on sources concerning Rus’ lands and adjacent territories. The author draws attention to the need to compare archaeological, written and iconographic sources in one study. The study focuses on the most representative sources, especially those that can be to apply on material from the Rus’ lands. It is emphasized that the shield as a basic element of protective equipment during the Middle Ages, іn Rus’ lands largely developed in line with European trends. Which in turn makes it impossible to isolate local features about to beginning of the ХІІІ century. At the turn of the XII–XIII centuries in some regions of Eastern Europe, namely the Rus’-Baltic-Polish border, a relatively new type of shield is being formed, the so-called “protopaveza”. This in turn had a direct impact on the armaments of Rus’ and the Teutonic Order in the ХІІІ–ХІV centuries. The author analyzes the main interactions and borrowings of types of shields between different regions of Eastern Europe during the Middle Ages. It is noted that in the Ukrainian medieval state of Rus’, which was at the intersection of Eastern and Western military traditions, shields of both European types and the eastern “kalkan” could be used. However, given the available sources, it is safe to say that the European trend of development of this protective equipment had an advantage. The author came to the conclusion that the shields used in Rus’ and Europe in the X–XII centuries generally belonged to the same types. In particular, it is round, almond-shaped and triangular shields. The issue of shields of the XIII–XV centuries remains more complicated. During this period can be observed as the influence of Western Europe on Rus’, for example, the spread of the knight's “tarch”. And trends that began in Eastern Europe, namely the spread of pavises in the XIV–XV centuries.
У статті розглянуто шаблю як елемент комплексу наступального озброєння середньовічного руського воїна. Зроблено акцент на теренах Волинського та Галицького князівств. Здійснено спробу визначити місце шаблі серед інших видів озброєння як в репрезентативно-статусному, так і в утилітарному плані. На підставі писемних та археологічних знахідок автор робить припущення, що шабля не була поширеним видом озброєння на вказаних землях, поступаючись мечу. Проте, вона була наявна серед озброєння як у степових сусідів, так і в деякого місцевого воїнства.
The article, based on an episode of the Galician-Volynian chronicle about the meeting of the Galician-Volynian prince Danylo Romanovych with German allies at Pozsony in 1252, analyzes the eastern influences in the armament of the Galician-Volynian state caused by the Golden Horde. Based on the context of the types of weapons mentioned in the episode, the place of certain weapons and means of protection in the armament complex of Rus’ woriors is analyzed. The research is based on the principles of historicism, scientific and authorial objectivity, as well as on the use of general scientific (analysis, synthesis, generalization, comparison) and special-historical (historical-typological, historical-systemic) methods. Listed comparison between the weapons described in the episode, was the chronicler called «Tatar», and items of Mongolian protective equipment and symbolic weapons, mentioned in a number of written sources of the XIII century. In addition, a comparison of written and archaeological sources was made. The author suggests that the gold-clad weapon of Prince Danylo mentioned in the text of the chronicle may have been given to him when the prince was included in the Horde’s hierarchy of power in 1245, but emphasizes the need to further clarify and revise this assumption. It is noted that the borrowing of Mongolian arms took place mostly in protective equipment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.