Background & Aims. Evaluation of the minimal residual disease (MRD) at different stages of chemotherapy is one of key prognostic factors and a factor of stratification of patients into risk groups in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The MRD detection on Day 15 and at later stages is based on identifying blast cells with a leukemia-associated immune phenotype. The aim is to assess the potential of 8-color standardized EuroFlow panels and to detect individual criteria for MRD monitoring during primary diagnosis. Materials & Methods. The analysis included data on the primary immune phenotype and MRD assessment during chemotherapy in 10 adults and 35 children with a confirmed diagnosis of B-cell precursors ALL. Results. The ALL phenotype characteristics at the stage of primary diagnosis permit to make the most complete description of the of 8-color standardized EuroFlow panels. This gives an opportunity to select the most informative antigen combinations for further MRD monitoring. Combinations with CD58/CD38, CD81/CD9 antigen expression, as well as assessment of pan-myeloid CD13, CD33 antigen co-expression may be recommended as the most frequent aberrant immune phenotypes of blast cells in ALL. As for B-lineage progenitor cells in children on Day 15 of the induction therapy, a detection of TdT+ сyCD22<sup>+</sup> cell population is necessary in addition to the quantification of CD10+ and/or CD34<sup>+</sup> В-lineage progenitor cells. Conclusion. Therefore, the 8-color standardized EuroFlow panels permit not only to characterize the primary ALL immune phenotype in details, but may also be widely used for MRD evaluation at all stages of chemotherapy.
Treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in children during the last 50 years has changed significantly, which has increased the survival of patients from 10–15 % in the early 60s to 80–85 % by the mid-2000s. Such results have been achieved through the development of new polychemotherapy regimens, the introduction of neuroleukemia prophylaxis, the strengthening of standard chemotherapy by increasing the dose and / or frequency of chemotherapeutic drugs administration, and the definition of criteria for patient stratification into prognostic risks groups and the development of principles of risk-adopted therapy.However, inspite of the overall success of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia therapy, some variants of acute lymphoblastic leukemia associated with poor prognosis, especially acute lymphoblastic leukemia with BCR-ABL1 and MLL rearrangements. Besides the prolonged persistence of minimal residual disease is also an unfavorable prognostic factor requiring therapy intensification.In the current issue we present the main steps in the evolution of programmed chemotherapy of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Great attention was paid for modern risk-stratifying criteria with an emphasis on minimal residual disease.
Background. Flow cytometry (FC) algorithms of detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) are well standardized, and approximate to molecular biologic methods. However, besides informative leukemia-associated aberrant immunophenotype, which are selected taking into account a tumor phenotype at diagnostics stage, it is necessary to consider specificity of the provided taget therapy and its influence on a cell. Objective: to offer stable combinations of antigens to identify B-cell precursors in patients on therapy of blinatumomab. Materials and methods. Clinical observation of patient G. 4 years old with B-cell precursors acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) (pre-pre-B immunosubtype), whom after 3 bloks of reinduction therapy, taking into account MRD-positive status, blinatumomab was appointed as a monotherapy. Tumor immunophenotype was characterized in details by FC protocol according to EuroFlow in debute and relapse of the disease. MRD monitoring was provided by 8-color FC taking into account personalized leukemia-associated aberrant immunophenotypes. Results. In patient with B-cell precursors ALL received blinatumomab, the strategy of MRD monitoring was changed. Due to the lack of CD19 expression, identification of B-cell precursors was based on expression of cyCD22 in combination with nuclear TdT and CD10. Conclusion. In case of blinatumomab’s appointment during B-cell precursors ALL therapy, it is necessary to change the strategy of B-cell precursors identification, due to the lack of CD19 expression. Detection of B-cell precursors should be provided by assessment of other pan-B lineage antigens. First of all, it is cyCD22 or cyCD79a in combination with nuclear TdT and CD10, within the limits of nucleated cells of the sample.
Background. Currently, overall survival rate for pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) do not exceed 70 %. The intensity of modern AML chemotherapeutic programs has reached its limit, and further chemotherapy dose escalation for treatment results improvement is impossible, because it fraught with life-threatening complications. It is investigating a new ways of tumor treatment for improvement of AML patient’s survival level: therapeutic efficacy of targeted and epigenetic drugs.Objective: to evaluate the efficacy of epigenetic drugs (azacitidine, decitabine, all-trans-retinoid acid and valproic acid) in combination with AML-BFM 2004 protocol for treatment of pediatric AML.Materials and methods. 80 patients with primary AML diagnosis were enrolled the study. Age was ranged from 8 months to 17 years (median 6.7 ± 0.6 years). From June 2012 to January 2018 all patients were subdivided in two treatment groups. 1st group included 34 patients treated with NII POH AML 2012 protocol, 2nd group – 46 patients treated by AML-BFM 2004 protocol.Results. 3-year relapse-free survival in 1st group, regardless of prognostic risk group, was 66.7 ± 11.7 %, 2nd group – 68.9 ± 9.9 %. Eventfree survival (EFS) for patients from 1st group was 66.7 ± 11.7 %, form 2nd group – 50.4 ± 10.2 %. Overall survival in 1st group was 66.7 ± 14.3 %, 2nd group – 66.9 ± 7.5 %. For patients with unfavorable risk from 1st treatment group 3-year relapse-free survival was 69.1 ± 11.9 %, 2nd – 64.9 ± 11.3 % (p = 0,8). EFS – 69.1 ± 11.9 and 44.8 ± 11.3 % respectively (p = 0,13). 3-year overall survival for patients with unfavorable risk group was 69.4 ± 14.6 and 64.4 ± 7.9 % in 1st and 2nd treatment groups respectively.Conclusion. The efficacy of decitabine in “window” regimen was higher in contrast to azacitidine; epigenetic therapy with AML-BFM 2004 protocol allow us to achieve a higher EFS, because of induction mortality and infection-related death decrease – EFS in 1st group was 16 % higher than in 2nd. Besides, EFS in unfavorable risk group, who treated with epigenetic drugs, was 25 % higher – 69.1 ± 11.9 % and 44.8 ± 11.3 % in 1st and 2nd groups respectively (p = 0.13). Nevertheless, overall survival in both groups was the same – 66 % (1st – 66.7 ± 14.3 % and 2nd – 66.9 ± 7.5 %).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.