Background. Renal cell carcinoma is one of the most common urologic cancers. Due to development of modern diagnostic methods, kidney tumors are often diagnosed at early stages (cT1a-T1b). The golden standard of treatment of localized renal cell carcinoma is tumor resection. In retroperitoneoscopic access, the time to artery access is decreased, the risk of intra- and postoperative complications is reduced. Retroperitoneal access is preferable for tumors located on the lateral or posterior kidney surface.Aim. To analyze the results of treatment of patients after retroperitoneoscopic kidney resection.Materials and methods. Between 2018 and 2021, at the A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center - branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center 47 retroperitoneoscopic kidney resections were performed (29 (61.7 %) in men, 18 (38.3 %) in women) due to stage cT1aN0M0 renal cell carcinoma. Retrospective analysis of demographic data, comorbid status, tumor characteristics, operative time, blood loss volume, frequency and severity of complications per the Clavien-Dindo classification was performed. Complexity of resection was evaluated using the R.E.N.A.L. scale.Results. Mean patient age was 63 (38-79) years, body mass index was 29.9 (22-39) kg/m2. Tumor of the left kidney was diagnosed in 24 (51.0 %) cases, of the right kidney - in 22 (46.8 %) cases, bilateral lesions - in 1 (2.2 %) case. Mean tumor size was 22.4 (11-39) mm. Resection had low complexity in 35 (74.5 %) cases, intermediate complexity in 12 (25.5 %) cases. Mean operative time was 156 (80-280) minutes, mean warm ischemia time was 19 (7-32) minutes, number of resections with zero ischemia was 15 (31.9 %), mean blood loss volume was 53 (10-300) mL, number of resections without renal parenchyma suturing was 10 (21.3 %). Mean hospitalization time after surgery was 5 days. Postoperative complications were observed in 4 (8.5 %) cases: bleeding (severity grade II per the Clavien-Dindo classification) in 1 (2.1 %) case, postoperative infectious complications (severity grade II) - in 2 (4.2 %) cases, subcutaneous hematoma (severity grade I) - in 1 (2.1 %) case.Conclusion. Retroperitoneoscopic access is effective and safe. This is confirmed by low frequency and severity of postoperative complications. This access allows to reduce hospitalization time and pain management medication which accelerates patient mobilization and recovery. Comparative analysis shows that retroperitoneoscopic kidney resection has the same effectiveness as laparoscopic resection.
Background. Prostate cancer is currently one of the most challenging problems in urological oncology due to its constantly increasing incidence and mortality in Russia. Surgery remains one of the most radical treatment options for patients with localized and locally advanced prostate cancer of any risk. Multiple studies have compared long-term and functional outcomes of surgeries performed using different surgical approaches. All studies have demonstrated similar long-term and functional outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted surgeries. Objective: to review the existing literature on this problem and analyze outcomes of surgical treatment in patients who had undergone open or laparoscopic prostatectomy in one of three federal centers of the National Medical Research Radiology Center.Materials and methods. This retrospective study included 2,772 patients with localized and locally advanced prostate cancer who had undergone surgery in one of the three federal centers.Results. We evaluated short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) performed at three federal centers of the National Medical Research Radiology Center. We found that laparoscopic RRP was associated with a longer surgery, lower blood loss, and fewer lymph nodes removed compared to open RRP. Long-term oncological and functional outcomes (prostate-specific antigen relapse-free survival, time to urination recovery) did not significantly differ between patients who had laparoscopic or open RRP.Conclusion. Both open and laparoscopic RRP are equally effective surgical methods for patients with localized and locally advanced prostate cancer.
Currently, due to the dynamic development of surgical technologies, indications for organ-sparing treatment of kidney cancer are expanding. Acute kidney injury is a serious complication that leads to chronic kidney disease, increased postoperative mortality, deterioration of long-term functional outcomes, and increased hospitalization. At present, it is known that even a slight damage to kidneys or their impairment, presented by a decreased urine output and change in blood biochemical parameters, entails serious clinical consequences and is associated with a poor prognosis. Damaging factors, when the kidney is exposed, initially induce molecular changes, which entail the production of certain biomarkers, and only after that clinical aspects of kidney damage develop. The causes of acute kidney injury can be different, from specific renal disorders (acute interstitial nephritis, vascular and glomerular lesions, prerenal azotemia, obstructive disorders) to toxic damages, direct trauma and surgical treatment. The development of acute renal injury in the postoperative period is a serious complication of the surgical treatment of kidney disease, and, according to various authors, the frequency of its occurrence varies from 5.5 % to 34 %. An active study of this problem made it possible to find specific biomarkers that give the possibility to predict and diagnose acute renal injury in the early stages, to optimize the treatment strategy, to reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, and to shorten the period of postoperative rehabilitation. Currently, the most studied of acute kidney injury (AKI) biomarkers are cystatin C, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin‑2 (NGAL), hepatic protein L-FABP, KIM‑1 (Kidney injury molecule‑1), Interleukin – 18. Further study of AKI biomarkers will make it possible to determine the most significant ones for subsequent use in everyday practice
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.