Purpose: to compare anatomical and optical parameters and aberrations of both eyes in patients with acquired and congenital anisometropic myopia.Material and methods. 22 patients (44 eyes) aged 18–35 (averagely, 25.2) with acquired and congenital anisometropic myopia were examined using the Galilei G6 optical eye system analyzer (Ziemer, Switzerland). The analysis of total, corneal and internal aberrations of the eye was carried out on an OPD-Scan III (Nidek) aberrometer.Results. In both groups with acquired and congenital anisometropic myopia, the axial length of the higher myopic eye was greater than that of the fellow eye. A greater asphericity and higher astigmatism of the cornea were revealed in higher myopic eyes of patients with congenital myopia as compared to acquired myopia. The total RMS HOA in congenital myopia was significantly greater in the higher myopic eye compared to the fellow eye (1.07 D and 0.68 D, respectively) and greater than in cases of acquired myopia. All HOA were greater in higher myopic eyes as compared to the fellow ones in cases of congenital myopia. In case of acquired myopia only the total coma appeared to be greater in the higher myopic eye. Corneal aberrations in acquired anisometropic myopia did not differ in the paired eyes. In case of congenital myopia, the total tilt was significantly greater in the higher myopic eye, and total coma and spherical aberration have lower values, even with a transition to negative ones (p < 0.05).Conclusion. The revealed differences of the wavefront of the eyes with anisometropic congenital and acquired myopia are rather a consequence of anatomical and optical differences (the axial length of the eyes and the topography of the cornea), than the cause of anisometropia.
Purpose: a covariance analysis of the planned and actually obtained refraction after excimer laser myopia correction surgery in middle-aged patients. Material and methods. 85 patients (170 eyes) aged 35 to 50 underwent excimer laser myopia correction surgery by FemtoLASIK. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to the degree of myopia: group 1 included 13 patients (26 eyes) with myopia from -1.25 to -3.0 D, group 2 had 42 patients (84 myopic eyes) from -3.25 to -6.0 D and group 3 had 30 patients (60 eyes) with myopia of -6.25 D or higher. Results. The patients with low myopia, independently of the age, revealed a postoperative refraction effect closer to that planned than the patients with moderate and high myopia. The difference (delta) between the planned and the obtained results was -0.35 ± 0.08 D (41%) in group 1, -0.58 ± 0.04 D (51.3%) in group 2 and -0.64 ± 0.05 D (46%) in group 3. The divergence between the respective indicators for figures for low and high myopic groups is statistically significant. Conclusion.Patients with low myopia over 35 years old can be recommended a symmetric hypocorrection in binocular format irrespective of the objective data regarding the initial corneal hydration, which affects the ablation volume. To achieve a better agreement between the planned and the actual hypoeffect (and, accordingly, a more precise dosage of the surgery) in patients with moderate and high myopia, it is important to introduce into clinical practice the technology of contactless measurement of corneal hydration.
The review covers the issue of hybrid contact lenses application as one of the modern contact correction methods in patients with ametropias of various genesis. Hybrid contact lenses consist of a rigid central optical part made of highly gas-permeable material and a flexible peripheral part made of hydrophilic material. These lenses combine the optical correction qualities of gas-permeable corneal lenses with the comfort and stable fit usually provided by soft contact lenses. Compared to gas-permeable corneal lenses, hybrid lenses are more comfortable; often have better centration and more stable fit on the eye. Hybrid contact lenses successfully correct both types of astigmatism: regular and irregular. This type of lenses is a good alternative method of contact correction for patients who place heavy demands in terms of the quality of vision.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.