Background: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) can present a challenge for clinicians. Multicolor flow cytometry (MFC) can aid in establishing a diagnosis. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal MFC approach for MDS. Methods:The study included 102 MDS (39 low-grade MDS), 83 cytopenic patients without myeloid neoplastic disorders (control group), and 35 healthy donors. Bone marrow was analyzed using a six-color MFC. Analysis was conducted according to the "Ogata score," "Wells score," and the integrated flow cytometry (iFC) score. Results:The respective sensitivity and specificity values were 77.5% and 90.4% for the Ogata score, 79.4% and 81.9% for the Wells score, and 87.3% and 87.6% for the iFC score. Specificity was not 100% due to deviations of MFC parameters in the control group. Patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) had higher levels of CD34 + CD7 + myeloid cells than donors. Aplastic anemia and PNH were characterized by a high proportion of CD56 + cells among CD34 + precursors and neutrophils. The proportion of MDS-related features increased with the progression of MDS. The highest number of CD34 + blasts was found in MDS with excess blasts.MDS with isolated del(5q) was characterized by a high proportion of CD34 + CD7 + cells and low granularity of neutrophils. In 39 low-grade MDS, the sensitivities were 53.8%, 61.5%, and 71.8% for Ogata score, Wells score, and iFC, respectively. Conclusion:The results support iFC as a useful diagnostic tool in MDS.

Objective. To analyze treatment results of 172 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) aged 18-60 years in National Medical Research Center for Hematology of MHRF. Materials and methods. Inductive and consolidation program for 139 (80%) patients was based on a standardized protocol: 4 courses “7+3” with different anthracycline use (2 courses of daunorubicin, idarubicin, mitoxantrone) and continuous use of cytarabine on the second inductive course. In 20% of patients cytarabine courses at the dose of 1 g/m2 2 times a day for 1-3 days combined with idarubicin and mitoxantrone were used as two consolidation courses. Allogenic bone marrow transplantation was performed in the first complete remission (CR) period in 40% of patients. Results. The frequency of CR achievement in all patients was 78.6%, refractory forms were observed in 13.9% of patients, early mortality - in 7.5% of patients. Seven-year overall survival (OS) rate was 40.7%, relapse free survival (RFS) - 43.2%. When estimating effectiveness depending on cytogenetic risk group it was demonstrated that 5-year OS and RFS in patients with translocation (8; 21) cannot be considered as satisfying, it accounted for 50 and 34%, respectively. At the same time in patients with 16th chromosome inversion (inv16) these characteristics accounted for 68.6 and 63.5%. Acquired results forced reconsidering of the consolidation program in AML patients of this subgroup. The median time to allogenic blood stem cells transplantation (allo-BSCT) in patients with first CR was 6.5 months that was taken as a reference point in landmark analysis of patients in whom allo-BSCT was not performed. Landmark analysis showed that in AML patients of favorable prognosis group allo-BSCT does not significantly reduce the probability of relapse (0 and 36%) and does not influence RFS (33 and 64%). In patients of border-line and poor prognosis allo-BSCT significantly reduces relapse probability (26 and 66%; 20 and 100%) and significantly increases a 7-year RFS (68.7 and 30%; 45.6 and 0%). Allo-BSCT also results in significant RFS increase and reduces the probability of relapse (25 and 78%) in patients in whom CR was achieved only after the second induction course. At the same time allo-BSCT does not influence patients who achieved CR after the first treatment course: 55 and 50%. Conclusion. Multivariate analysis showed that cytogenetic risk group (HR=2.3), time of CR achievement (HR=2.9), and allo-BSCT transplantation (HR=0.16) are independent factors for disease relapse prognosis after achieving CR.

No abstract

1879 Splenectomy in patients with MDS is a treatment option that is beeing applied very rare [Steensma D., et al, Leuk Res.,2003; Bourgeosis E., et al, Leukemia, 2001]. There are anecdotal reports with very few patients demonstrating its efficacy. In most cases splenectomy was indicated for MDS patients with immune related thrombocytopenia. Here we would like to report the results of 33 splenectomies in patients with MDS who have been treated in our Center during 1994–2010. Within this period of follow-up totally 155 patients were diagnosed with different forms of MDS, 35% of them presenting with hypoplasia. The MDS treatment algorithm in our Center incorporates splenectomy as one of the options for pts with hypoplastic forms of MDS with bone marrow blast count less than 10%, refractory to initial cyclosporin A treatment or refractory to transfusions. Among patients who were splenectomised there were 20 females, 13 males with a median age of 40 years (range 18–74). Median time from diagnosis to splenectomy was 12 months (range 4–107). By WHO-classification there were 2 patients with RA, 22 – with RCMD, 2 – with MDS and del (5q), 6 - with RAEB, 1 - with AML after MDS. Cytogenetic analysis was available in 32 cases, and karyotype was normal in 15 patients (47%).The most common abnormalities were: del (5q) - 3, del (20q) - 2, trisomy 8 - 2, tetrasomy 8 - 1, monosomy 7 - 2, complex karyotype - 4. Bone marrow biopsy revealed hypoplasia in 25 patients (75%), myelofibrosis – in 7 (21%). The median WBC count was 2,6*109/L (range 0,6-8,7), hemoglobin 6,9 g/dL (47-119) and platelets 26*109/L (6-170). 27 pts (82%) were RBC transfusion dependent, 22 (67%) - platelets transfusion dependent. 13 pts had received immunosuppression therapy (ATG, cyclosporine A) before splenectomy, 2 - cytotoxic chemotherapy, 3 - decitabine. The majority of splenectomies were done by laparoscopic method - 26 (79%), in one case the convertion was done. In all cases we performed liver biopsy. Postoperative complications (hemorrhage) occurred in 1 patient but there were no deaths due to operation. One death occurred in 7 days after splenectomy due to fulminant progression to AML. Median spleen weight was 180 gms (range 70–930). Median intraoperative blood loss was 250 ml (range 50–9350). Histology was available in 30 patients. Extramedullary hematopoesis was revealed in 3 cases (10%), blast infiltration - in 2 (7%), massive lymphoid infiltration was detected in 5 cases and in one patient in was proved to be clonal (marginal zone lymphoma, MZL). Hemosiderin depositions in the macrophages were seen in half of the cases -16 (53%). One case was characterized by granulomatosis in spleen and liver with negative immunohistohemical staining to Mycobacteria tuberculosis. Splenectomy lead to sustained improvement of cytopenias in 16 cases (48%): decreased transfusion dependence in 14 (42%) and transfusion independence in 2 (6%). After splenectomy 5 patients were followed by “wait and see” approach, 17 continued with immunosuppressive therapy (ATG,CyA), 3 patients were treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy, 1 – with decytabine, 2 received EPO, 1- danazol, 2 - iron chelation therapy, 2 – only transfusions therapy. We did not noticed the infections rate augmentation after splenectomy. Transformation to AML was registered 6 (18%) at median 6 months (0,3 -9). 13 splenectomized patients (39%) died at a median 12 months (range 0,3-84) and the main death reasons were: AML progression, aplasia deterioration followed by infections and hemorrhage. 20 patients are alive with a median follow-up after splenectomy 33 months (2-108). Analysis of our 15-years study data give us a confidence to conclude that splenectomy still may be an adequate option for distinct forms of MDS (hypoplastic forms with bone marrow blast count less than 10%, refractory to initial immunosupressive treatment or refractory to transfusions), producing cytopenia improvement in half of the patients with decreasing transfusion dependance also in half of the patients, sometimes bringing a clear diagnosis (MZL). The mechanism of action is not very clear but we can speculate that splenectomy removes the “cell-destroying” organ, deminishes immune pathways of cytopenias due to large lymphoid compartment deletion, provides the resustainment of sensitivity to immunosupressive agents. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Plasma fibronectin is a high molecular weight adhesive glycoprotein. There are two types of fibronectin: plasma (soluble) and cellular derived (insoluble). Electron microscopy revealed two types of structural organization of fibronectin: compact and expanded. In solution, fibronectin has a compact conformation, and after binding to certain substrates (collagen, fibrin, heparin), it is expanded. Plasma fibronectin is one of the main opsonins of blood plasma in relation to the “targets” of phagocytosis of a predominantly non-bacterial nature, as well as to some types of bacteria. For the treatment of septic processes, as well as respiratory distress syndrome of adults with severe fibronectin deficiency, plasma cryoprecipitate is used – a donor plasma preparation containing a large amount of plasma fibronectin (more than 2 mg/ml). It was proposed to replenish the level of fibronectin in patients with sepsis and other conditions that cause plasma fibronectin deficiency with the help of donor freshly frozen plasma. Transfusion of large volumes of freshly frozen plasma (up to 1000–1500 ml) to patients effectively eliminates the deficiency of plasma fibronectin. The concentration of plasma fibronectin in the blood significantly decreases after the addition of severe infectious processes to hematological diseases, as well as acute DIC syndrome. Extracorporeal methods of blood purification – selective plasmapheresis – have been developed to correct immunocomplex and fibronectin-complex pathology. Two variants of selective plasmapheresis have been proposed: the method of heparinocryoprecipitation of plasma proteins and the method of heparinocryofractionation. In 1987, a plasma heparin precipitate was proposed as a source of fibronectin for the treatment of patients with trophic skin lesions. In 1992, a new method was proposed for obtaining blood preparations with a high concentration of plasma fibronectin from patients themselves (heparin cryofractionation). Autofibronectin preparations obtained by such methods are effective in the local treatment of trophic ulcers in 90–93% of cases. The proposed drugs are safe against infection of patients with infectious diseases transmitted through the blood.

Introduction Despite the availability of vaccination against COVID 19 for all population categories since January 2021, it is moving slowly in Russia. Patients (pts) with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) usually lead a normal life with social interactions. In the context of the COVID 19 pandemic, we find it important to identify the factors of adherence to vaccination and clarify the concerns. Objective: To determine the proportion of CML pts willing to consider vaccination against COVID 19, adherence factors and reasons for not vaccinating. Materials and methods. A survey on the attitude to vaccination against COVID 19 was prospectively carried out among all pts with CML consulted at the outpatient department of National Research Center for Hematology (Moscow, Russia) who agreed to participate. The key questions included considerations for and against vaccination, socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, lifestyle, comorbidities and history of COVID 19. Results. Within 4 months (from March 15 to July 19, 2021), 172 CML pts completed the questionnaire. CML chronic phase, advanced phase and blast crisis were in 167 (97%), 4 (2%) and 1(1%) respectively. In total, 141 (82%) pts were on therapy with 1 st, 2 nd and >3 rd therapy line in 77 (55%), 33 (23%) and 31 (22%) pts, respectively. Thirty one (18%) had no therapy: 6 (3.5%) newly diagnozed, 25 (14.5%) in a treatment-free remission. A deep and major molecular response was in 77 (45%) and 30 (17%) pts, respectively. Presence and absence of molecular response MR2 was in 20 (12%) and 45 (26%) pts respectively. The median age of pts was 46 years (range 19-82), 75(44%) were males. Married 108 (63%), 70 (41%) lived with elderly relatives, 35 (20%) with children. A higher education was in 123 (72%) pts, 123 (72%) could not work remotely and 46 (27%) had interactions to people by work. Any comorbidity was in 89 (52%) pts, 42(24%) had >1 concomitant disease, 48 (28%) had cardiovascular diseases, 44 (26%) had an obesity. A history of COVID 19 was in 41 (24%) pts and in the close circle of 74 (43%) pts. Vaccination was supported by 94(55%) pts (with 29 (17%) already vaccinated) and not supported by 76 (44%) pts, 2 (1%) pts did not answer. Among those supporting vaccination vs not supporting there was significantly more males (52% vs 33%, p=0,012), married pts (73% vs 49%, p<0,001) and pts with higher education (88% vs 51%, p=0,006). Other factors (age, comorbidities, obesity, profession-related features, COVID 19 in pts or their environment, living with elderly relatives or children, therapy and treatment response) were not significant. Less pts were against vaccination in June-July 2021 before the 3 rd outbreak of COVID 19 compared to spring period (33% vs 50%, p=0,045). The two most common reasons to avoid vaccination were the fear of complications in 37(49%) pts and waiting for additional data in 19(25%) (Fig.1). Notably, 7 (9%) pts considered CML as a contraindication to vaccination. Among those supporting vaccination, 55(59%) preferred to choose the GamCovidVac (Sputnik V) vaccine, 20(21%) had no preference (Fig.2). Out of 32 pts who gave the rationale for the Sputnik V choice 19(59%) noted its best availability, study or popularity (Fig.3). Among 23 pts with additional questions 12 (52%) wondered about the possibility of vaccination with CML diagnosis and 6 (26%) asked help with a vaccine choice. Conclusion: Despite access to vaccines against COVID 19 with proven efficacy and safety, almost half of CML pts (44%) do not support vaccination. Socio-demographic factors such as gender, education, marriage status appeared to be significant for this decision. Considering the frequent concerns of the possibility of vaccination with CML diagnosis as well as the fear of complications, hematologists should provide a relevant clarifying information on these issues. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Chelysheva: Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Novartis Pharma: Speakers Bureau; Pharmstandart: Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau. Petrova: Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Novartis Pharma: Speakers Bureau. Gurianova: Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Kokhno: Novartis Pharma: Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau. Turkina: Novartis Pharma: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Pharmstandart: Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau.

No abstract

No abstract