No abstract

Training an end-to-end (E2E) neural network speech-to-intent (S2I) system that directly extracts intents from speech requires large amounts of intent-labeled speech data, which is time consuming and expensive to collect. Initializing the S2I model with an ASR model trained on copious speech data can alleviate data sparsity. In this paper, we attempt to leverage NLU text resources. We implemented a CTC-based S2I system that matches the performance of a state-ofthe-art, traditional cascaded SLU system. We performed controlled experiments with varying amounts of speech and text training data. When only a tenth of the original data is available, intent classification accuracy degrades by 7.6% absolute. Assuming we have additional text-to-intent data (without speech) available, we investigated two techniques to improve the S2I system: (1) transfer learning, in which acoustic embeddings for intent classification are tied to fine-tuned BERT text embeddings; and (2) data augmentation, in which the textto-intent data is converted into speech-to-intent data using a multispeaker text-to-speech system. The proposed approaches recover 80% of performance lost due to using limited intent-labeled speech.

We present a lightweight adaptable neural TTS system with high quality output. The system is composed of three separate neural network blocks: prosody prediction, acoustic feature prediction and Linear Prediction Coding Net as a neural vocoder. This system can synthesize speech with close to natural quality while running 3 times faster than real-time on a standard CPU.The modular setup of the system allows for simple adaptation to new voices with a small amount of data.We first demonstrate the ability of the system to produce high quality speech when trained on large, high quality datasets. Following that, we demonstrate its adaptability by mimicking unseen voices using 5 to 20 minutes long datasets with lower recording quality. Large scale Mean Opinion Score quality and similarity tests are presented, showing that the system can adapt to unseen voices with quality gap of 0.12 and similarity gap of 3% compared to natural speech for male voices and quality gap of 0.35 and similarity of gap of 9 % for female voices.

No abstract

No abstract