In recent years, a lot of scientific interest has focused on cancer immunotherapy. Although chronic inflammation has been described as one of the hallmarks of cancer, acute inflammation can actually trigger the immune system to fight diseases, including cancer. Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands have long been used as adjuvants for traditional vaccines and it seems they may also play a role enhancing efficiency of tumor immunotherapy. The aim of this perspective is to discuss the effects of TLR stimulation in cancer, expression of various TLRs in different types of tumors, and finally the role of TLRs in anti-cancer immunity and tumor rejection.

In recent years, much research has been focused on the field of adoptive cell therapies (ACT) that use native or genetically modified T cells as therapeutic tools. Immunotherapy with T cells expressing chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) demonstrated great success in the treatment of haematologic malignancies, whereas adoptive transfer of autologous tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) proved to be highly effective in metastatic melanoma. These encouraging results initiated many studies where ACT was tested as a treatment for various solid tumours. In this review, we provide an overview of the challenges of T cell-based immunotherapies of solid tumours. We describe alternative approaches for choosing the most efficient T cells for cancer treatment in terms of their tumour-specificity and phenotype. Finally, we present strategies for improvement of anti-tumour potential of T cells, including combination therapies.

Background: Prostate cancer (PC) tissue contains all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) at a very low level (10 −9 M), at least an order of magnitude lower than in adjacent normal healthy prostate cells or benign prostate hyperplasia. When this is coupled with deregulated expression of the intracellular lipid-binding proteins FABP5 and CRABP2 that is frequently found in PC, this is likely to result in the preferential delivery of ATRA to oncogenic PPARβ/δ rather than retinoic acid receptors (RARs). There are three isotypes of RARs (RARα, RARβ, and RARγ) and recent studies have revealed discrete physiological roles. For example, RARα and RARγ promote differentiation and self-renewal, respectively, which are critical for proper hematopoiesis. Aims: We have previously shown that ATRA stimulates transactivation of RARγ at sub-nanomolar concentrations (EC 50 0.24 nM), whereas an 80-fold higher concentration was required for RARα-mediated transactivation (EC 50 19.3 nM). Additionally, we have shown that RAR pan-antagonists inhibit the growth of PC cells (at 16-34 nM). These findings, together with the low level of ATRA in PC, led us to hypothesize that RARγ plays a role in PC pathogenesis and that RARγ-selective antagonism may be an effective treatment. Methods and results: We found that concentrations of 10 −9 M and below of ATRA promoted survival/proliferation and opposed adipogenic differentiation of human PC cell lines by a mechanism that involves RARγ. We also found that a RARγ-selective antagonist (AGN205728) potently induced mitochondria-dependent, but caspaseindependent, cell death in PC cell lines. Furthermore, AGN205728 demonstrated synergism in killing PC cells in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents. Conclusion: We suggest that the use of RARγ-selective antagonists may be effective in PC (and potentially other cancers), either as a single agent or in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy.

RNA editing is one of the most prevalent and abundant forms of post-transcriptional RNA modification observed in normal physiological processes and often aberrant in diseases including cancer. RNA editing changes the sequences of mRNAs, making them different from the source DNA sequence. Edited mRNAs can produce editing-recoded protein isoforms that are functionally different from the corresponding genome-encoded protein isoforms. The major type of RNA editing in mammals occurs by enzymatic deamination of adenosine to inosine (A-to-I) within double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) or hairpins in pre-mRNA transcripts. Enzymes that catalyse these processes belong to the adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (ADAR) family. The vast majority of knowledge on the RNA editing landscape relevant to human disease has been acquired using in vitro cancer cell culture models. The limitation of such in vitro models, however, is that the physiological or disease relevance of results obtained is not necessarily obvious. In this review we focus on discussing in vivo occurring RNA editing events that have been identified in human cancer tissue using samples surgically resected or clinically retrieved from patients. We discuss how RNA editing events occurring in tumours in vivo can identify pathological signalling mechanisms relevant to human cancer physiology which is linked to the different stages of cancer progression including initiation, promotion, survival, proliferation, immune escape and metastasis.

Cell-based immunotherapies can provide safe and effective treatments for various disorders including autoimmunity, cancer, and excessive proinflammatory events in sepsis or viral infections. However, to achieve this goal there is a need for deeper understanding of mechanisms of the intercellular interactions. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are a lymphocyte subset that maintain peripheral tolerance, whilst mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent nonhematopoietic progenitor cells. Despite coming from different origins, Tregs and MSCs share immunoregulatory properties that have been tested in clinical trials. Here we demonstrate how direct and indirect contact with allogenic MSCs improves Tregs’ potential for accumulation of immunosuppressive adenosine and suppression of conventional T cell proliferation, making them more potent therapeutic tools. Our results also demonstrate that direct communication between Tregs and MSCs is based on transfer of active mitochondria and fragments of plasma membrane from MSCs to Tregs, an event that is HLA-dependent and associates with HLA-C and HLA-DRB1 eplet mismatch load between Treg and MSC donors.

No abstract

This review focuses on the role of regulatory T cells (Tregs) in the process of carcinogenesis. The controversy of this issue arose due to the increasing therapeutic use of Tregs in humans (inter alia, in the treatment of autoimmune diseases). It is mainly due to potential dangers related to immunosuppressive activity of these cells, especially regarding cancer. The natural function of regulatory T cells (which is the suppression of excessive activity of the immune system) is purportedly linked to an increased risk of cancer initiation. This work brings together and summarizes the most important reports of researchers dealing with this problem and attempts to explain doubts and fears related to Tregs and their uncertain connection with cancer initiation and progression. It is clearly shown that regulatory T cells are associated with acceleration of existing tumors (they are attracted by microenvironments created by cancer cells) but cannot initiate them on their own.

BackgroundHuman regulatory T cells (Tregs) are the fundamental component of the immune system imposing immune tolerance via control of effector T cells (Teffs). Ongoing attempts to improve Tregs function have led to the creation of a protocol that produces antigen-specific Tregs, when polyclonal Tregs are stimulated with monocytes loaded with antigens specific for type 1 diabetes. Nevertheless, the efficiency of the suppression exerted by the produced Tregs depended on the antigen with the best results when insulin β chain peptide 9-23 was used. Here, we examined epigenetic modifications, which could influence these functional differences.MethodsThe analysis was pefromed in the sorted specific (SPEC, proliferating) and unspecific (UNSPEC, non-proliferating) subsets of Tregs and Teffs generated by the stimulation with monocytes loaded with either whole insulin (INS) or insulin β chain peptide 9-23 (B:9-23) or polyclonal cells stimulated with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 beads (POLY). A relative expression of crucial Tregs genes was determined by qRT-PCR. The Treg-specific demethylated region (TSDR) in FoxP3 gene methylation levels were assessed by Quantitative Methylation Specific PCR (qMSP). ELISA was used to measure genomic DNA methylation and histone H3 post-translational modifications (PTMs).ResultsTregs SPECB:9-23 was the only subset expressing all assessed genes necessary for regulatory function with the highest level of expression among all analyzed conditions. The methylation of global DNA as well as TSDR were significantly lower in Tregs SPECB:9-23 than in Tregs SPECINS. When compared to Teffs, Tregs were characterized by a relatively lower level of PTMs but it varied in respective Tregs/Teffs pairs. Importantly, whenever the difference in PTM within Tregs/Teffs pair was significant, it was always low in one subset from the pair and high in the other. It was always low in Tregs SPECINS and high in Teffs SPECINS, while it was high in Tregs UNSPECINS and low in Teffs UNSPECINS. There were no differences in Tregs/Teffs SPECB:9-23 pair and the level of modifications was low in Tregs UNSPECB:9-23 and high in Teffs UNSPECB:9-23. The regions of PTMs in which differences were significant overlapped only partially between particular Tregs/Teffs pairs.ConclusionsWhole insulin and insulin β chain peptide 9-23 affected epigenetic changes in CD4+ T cells differently, when presented by monocytes. The peptide preferably favored specific Tregs, while whole insulin activated both Tregs and Teffs.