Trafficking in persons is a modern form of human slavery (Modern Day Slavery) and is one of the worst forms of treatment for violations of human dignity. In this study, the type of research used is normative juridical research with a law approach and a concept approach. From the results of the study, it can be concluded that the use of criminal law regarding corporate criminal liability in the crime of trafficking in persons with a transnational dimension at Unit IV Sub-Directorate III of the Directorate of General Crimes of the Criminal Investigation Unit of the Police is to harmonize the legal arrangements for the criminal act of trafficking in persons charged by the public prosecutor that there are in Article 10 of Law Number 21 of 2007 concerning the Eradication of the Crime of Trafficking in Persons with the theory put forward by experts related to the elements of criminal liability and the model of corporate criminal liability. The implementation of corporate criminal responsibility in law enforcement of the criminal act of trafficking in persons with an effective transnational dimension is one whose solution prioritizes the concept of restorative justice. The concept of restorative justice is the concept of resolving a particular crime that involves all interested parties to jointly seek a solution and at the same time find a solution in dealing with events after the crime has arisen and how to overcome its implications in the future.
The implementation of restorative justice (restorative justice) in the handling of corruption in the Covid-19 aid fund contained in Decision Number 8/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2021/PN.Jkt.Pst with the Defendant Harry Van Sidabukke, it can be seen that the panel of judges did not apply the concept of restorative justice. Because in its order, the Panel of Judges instead imposed a prison sentence of 4 (four) years on the Defendant. This means that the sanctions imposed by the judge still adopt the concept of retributive justice which focuses more on retaliation. The retaliation is manifested in the form of sentencing the Defendant. In addition, regarding the implementation of restorative justice in handling corruption cases of Covid-19 aid funds that need to be developed in Indonesian law enforcement, it is related to the provision of sanctions for the Defendant to focus more on recovering losses to state finances instead of focusing on retaliation. That is, in this case the application of the concept of restorative justice needs to be considered by the Panel of Judges so that the return of state losses becomes the main crime, not an additional crime. Because in the context of law enforcement in Indonesia, the restorative justice approach for corruption cases, both small-scale corruption and those that cause harm to state finances, has so far not been implemented. This is because the legal basis for the application of restorative justice for corruption cases in the internal prosecutor's office is not sufficient. This is because the current Attorney General's Regulation does not regulate corruption as a case that can be resolved through restorative justice.
The practice of thuggery carried out by corporations is often found in the loan repayment process. This had resulted in the mushrooming of debt collector businesses, which generally employed high-profile ex-convicts who were used as collateral to intimidate other parties. In this study, the type of research used is normative juridical research using a law approach and a case approach. From the results of the study, it can be concluded that the enforcement of corporate criminal law against thuggery activities in the four cases studied by the authors was carried out by applying a penal policy (repressive effort). Repressive efforts were made against the Defendants by making arrests and then examining them for questioning for their actions. However, because the actions of the Defendants have deeply disturbed the public, especially the container trailer truck drivers, especially the actions of the Defendants are also contrary to the applicable regulations, the Public Prosecutor submits the Defendants to trial for later examination and trial by the Panel of Judges in the fairest way possible. The application of corporate criminal responsibility to thuggery, in this case the Panel of Judges sentenced the Defendants who were involved in one unit to PT. Tanjung Raya Kemilau, meaning, in this case the Panel of Judges applies the first model of the theory of corporate responsibility proposed by Mardjono Reksodiputro, namely "Corporate Management as the maker and the administrator is responsible", while still aligning the theory and the applicable legal rules contained in Article 48, Article 49, Article 50, Article 56, Article 486, Article 487 and Article 595 of the latest Draft Criminal Code. Thus, as one of the law enforcement officers, the panel of judges has carried out their duties in accordance with applicable regulations.
Bribery case at PT. Garuda Indonesia is a cross-jurisdictional corruption case involving several countries. The purpose of this research is to analyze the international cooperation carried out by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) in the investigation of bribery cases at PT. Garuda Indonesia. The research method used is a qualitative approach with a case study method. The data analysis used is the theory of international cooperation in dealing with corruption, jurisdictional theory, and the concept of transnational crime. The results of his research show that the bribery case at PT. Garuda involves multiple jurisdictions, namely: Indonesia, United Kingdom, Singapore, Hong Kong, France, and Canada. KPK-SFO-CPIB international cooperation process shows a new format of cooperation because it is carried out by the anti-corruption agency with a parallel investigations format. KPK cooperates with the agency through the MoU and MLA mechanisms referring to international instruments, namely the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC). Even though the platform has been created, there are still many challenges and obstacles due to differences in the legal system, language and time. KPK encountered problems when it wanted to cooperate with Hong Kong's ICAC, Canada's RCMP, and France's PNF. The keys to the success of KPK in this collaboration are the diplomatic approach, speed of coordination, accuracy in strategies of communication, and commitment, as well as trust and adjustment of cooperation mechanisms according to the standards of each country.
Artikel ini membahas tentang pengaturan pada Buku Kesatu RUU KUHP yang terkait dengan tugas Polri sebagai penyidik. Potensi permasalahan yang akan timbul dan proyeksi antisipatif dari kepentingan Polri menjadi bahasan dalam artikel ini. Pembahasan diantaranya meliputi ebijakan kriminalisasi dalam RUU KUHP dihubungkan dengan upaya mengefektifkan penerapannya sekaligus beserta dengan penguatan tugas, kewenangan dan fungsi kepolisian (dhi. Polri) dalam penegakan hukum pidana. RUU KUHP yang jika berlaku akan menjadi rujukan hukum materil, tentu akan menjadi landasan bagi penyusunan RUU KUHAP yang jika diberlakukan menjadi rujukan hukum formil, yang akan berdampak bagi Polri sebagai penegak hukum. Polri perlu mempertimbangkan sikapnya dalam konteks sebagai aparat penegak hukum. Pembahasan artikel ini diharapkan dapat mendorong terbangunnya kesepahaman persepsi dalam memahami RUU KUHP bagi sejumlah akademisi dan praktisi hukum (khususnya Polri), baik dari landasan filosofis, sosiologis dan yuridis RUU KUHP, khususnya pada Pasal-Pasal yang dianggap kontroversi dalam RUU KUHP yang terkait deng fungsi Polri. Semoga artikel ini dapat dijadikan sebagai bahan masukan konstruktif guna merumuskan kebijakan-kebijakan hukum (penal policy) dalam menyusun peraturan perundang-undangan terutama yang berhubungan dengan RUU KUHP. Khususnya bagi Polri, diharapkan artikel ini dapat menjadi bahan masukan guna membantu proses perubahan perilaku (transformasi kultural) aparat kepolisian dalam memandang suatu tindak pidana dan persepsi masyarakat atas perbuatan pidana yang berhubungan dengan RUU KUHP. Sehingga Polri dapat segera melakukan pemetaan potensi permasalahan pasal-pasal dalam RUU KUHP Buku Kesatu dihubungkan dengan tugas, kewenangan dan fungsi kepolisian yang berlaku bagi lingkungan Polri, juga sekaligus memproyeksikan upaya Polri mempersiapkan Rencana Tindak Lanjut (RTL) untuk mengantisipasi potensi permasalahan pasal-pasal dalam RUU KUHP Buku Kesatu.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.