No abstract

Geriatric assessment (GA) is supported by recent trials and guidelines yet rarely implemented due to a lack of resources. We performed an economic evaluation of a geriatric oncology clinic. Pre-GA proposed treatments and post-GA actual treatments were obtained from a detailed chart review of patients seen at a single academic centre. GA-based costs for investigations and referrals were calculated. Unit costs were obtained for surgical, radiation, systemic therapy, laboratory, imaging, physician, nursing, and allied health care (all in 2019 Canadian dollars). A six-month time horizon and government payer perspective were used. Consecutive patients aged 65 years or older (n = 152, mean age 82 y) and referred in the pre-treatment setting between July 2016 and June 2018 were included. Treatment plans were modified for 51% of patients. Costs associated with planned treatment were CAD 3,655,015. Costs associated with GA and related interventions were CAD 95,798. Final treatment costs were CAD 2,436,379. Net savings associated with the clinic were CAD 1,122,837, or CAD 7387 per patient seen. Findings were robust in multiple sensitivity analyses. Combined with mounting trial data demonstrating the clinical benefits of GA, our data can inform a strong business case for geriatric oncology clinics in health care environments similar to ours, but additional studies in diverse health care settings are warranted.

No abstract

No abstract

Suppl 2 -S18 Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify predictive factors of biological behaviour and patient outcome after surgical resection of meningiomas. Methodology: We retrospectively reviewed 192 cases of meningiomas who had undergone surgical resection in the Department of Neurosurgery at Toronto Western Hospital the last 5 years. Our cohort consisted of 64 males and 128 females. Clinical, radiological, and pathological records were review for data regarding: patientssex, age, tumor grade, tumor location, presence of peritumoral edema prior to surgical resection, and tumors largest diameter as a clinical measure of tumor size. All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS 20.0. Results: The incidence of peritumoral edema was significantly greater in males (45/64, 73%) than in females patients (64/128, 50.0%) (p=0.007). Meningioma location was significantly associated with presence of edema (p<0.001); olfactory meningiomas showed the greatest incidence of edema (71.4%) followed by convexity meningiomas (60.5%), abd sphenoid wing meningiomas (72.2%) (p<0.001). Tumors with larger extrameatal diameters (4.3cm vs. 3.5cm) were more likely to have peritumoral edema (p=0.001). The presence of residual tumor after surgical resection was more likely in meningiomas with higher grades p<0.001. Also, as expected, the grade of tumor was significantly correlated with the incidence of recurrence. Recurrence was also found to be more common in men (15.6%) than in women (4.7%) (p=0.01). Conclusion: The present study demonstrates that specific radiologic and histopathologic characteristics are significant predictors of tumor recurrence and patient outcome. CP13

e20519 Background: Clinical trials in multiple myeloma (MM) typically enroll patients that are younger and less frail while 33% patients are over the age of 75. Advanced age/frailty is associated with worse prognosis, partly due to poor tolerability of therapy. Compared to doublets, triplets improve progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS), but these outcomes are not well studied in older patients. Here, we compare doublet and triplet therapy in newly diagnosed MM patients over 75. Methods: The MMRF’s CoMMpass trial is an international, longitudinal, observational study capturing disease progression and response to treatment. Using the MMRF database, we compared doublet versus triplet therapy in patients over 75. Primary outcome was PFS while secondary outcomes included OS, quality of life (QoL) and fatigue. QoL was assessed using EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and fatigue was captured by the MM eCRF survey. Results: 146 patients were eligible for analysis. Median age was 80 years. 27 (18%) were ISS 1, 38 (26%) were ISS 2, and 59 (40%) were ISS 3. Amongst doublets (n = 62), 48% received Bortezomib/Dexamethasone while 48% received Lenalidomide/Dexamethasone. Amongst triplets (n = 71), 35% received both proteasome inhibitors (PI) and immunomodulatory drugs (IMIDs), whereas 58% received PI-based therapy with no IMID. Mean PFS for doublets was 467 days and for triplets was 608 days, with difference of 141 days (p = 0.0663). Mean OS for doublets was 757 days and for triplets was 920 days. Difference of 163 days was not statistically significant (p = 0.1784). In doublets, QoL remained at a median of 50% from baseline to 5 years. In triplets, QoL improved from a median 58% to 83% from baseline to 5 years. With respect to fatigue, levels remained unchanged from baseline to 5 years in doublets (43 to 44%) and dropped from 37% to 29% in triplets. Conclusions: There is a trend towards improved PFS, as well as an improvement in QoL and fatigue in MM patients over 75 that are treated with triplets as compared to those treated with doublets. Limitations include lack of randomization and selection bias.

e23025 Background: Older adults with cancer are at increased risk of delirium given their advanced age, multiple comorbidities and medications, prevalence of cognitive impairment, and possibly cancer treatment. Awareness of such risks and interventions to prevent or treat delirium is important to clinicians and to provide high quality care. However, there is scant published information on the risks of delirium with chemotherapy or evidence-based approaches to prevent or treat it. We performed a scoping review to summarize the available evidence. Methods: We conducted a scoping review using the framework of Arksey and O’Malley. We systematically searched peer-reviewed journal articles in English, French, and German from Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, CINAHL Plus, and Cochrane Central from inception until January 2017 to identify studies that examined delirium in patients receiving chemotherapy. We also attempted to identify any studies that reported on multivariable delirium risk prediction models and any clinical trials that examined prevention or treatment of delirium. Article titles and abstracts as well as full text articles were reviewed using Covidence software by two or more reviewers independently. Similarly, data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers. Results: A total of 21,678 titles and abstracts were screened, and 1,166 full-text articles were reviewed. Nineteen articles with varying study designs (retrospective administrative databases to clinical trials) reported on delirium using an acceptable diagnostic standard. Sample sizes varied from 15 to over 21,000. No one tumour site or treatment protocol constituted the majority of studies. The incidence of delirium ranged from 0 to 51% (mean 13.5%). The time course of delirium relative to the cycle of chemotherapy was inconsistently reported. No studies reported on risk prediction models for delirium, and no intervention studies to prevent or treat delirium were identified. An additional 109 studies reported on outcomes that could be part of the delirium syndrome but did not meet even our broad inclusion criteria (e.g. cognitive disturbance). Conclusions: Delirium may occur in over 1 in 8 older adults receiving chemotherapy, although there were substantial limitations in reported studies. This scoping review highlights the dearth of knowledge in the area, particularly for risk factors, prevention, and treatment, and emphasizes the need for high-quality studies examining these important outcomes in the oncology setting.

No abstract