The aim of the study was to examine the effectiveness and safety of cariprazine in routine psychiatric settings on schizophrenia patients with negative symptoms who have been treated with antipsychotics previously but without sufficient success. This was an open-label, flexible-dose, 16-week, observational study in Latvia. The primary outcome measure was an array of anamnesisbased clinical questions on schizophrenia symptoms rated on a seven-point scale. Other outcome measurements were the clinical global impression improvement (CGI-I) and severity (CGI-S) scales. Safety parameters included spontaneous reports of adverse events and specific assessments of extrapyramidal side-effects. A mixed model for repeated measures was fit to the data to evaluate the mean change from baseline for all visits. A total of 116 patients enrolled in the study (completion: 83%). Change from baseline to termination in symptom control was statistically significant (−7.3; P < 0.001), with the most improvement in negative symptoms (−6.3; P < 0.001). Over 70% of patients improved minimally or much based on the CGI-I scores at the final visit, and the CGI-S scores indicated an overall improvement in severity from moderately to mildly ill. 40% of patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events. Over 70% of doctors were satisfied with the effectiveness and tolerability of cariprazine. Cariprazine significantly improved negative symptoms in schizophrenia patients.

Although the optimal dosing of an antipsychotic medication is known to be essential in the long-term management of schizophrenia, in case of novel drugs such as cariprazine, determining the right dosing strategy is not that simple. Without decades of experience with a particular compound, evidence regarding dosing and titration comes primarily from double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trials that are not necessarily mirroring the real-life experiences of doctors. Via summarizing data from both clinical data (n = 3275) and real-world evidence (observational study n = 116, case studies n = 29), this perspective paper aims to shed a light on the appropriate dosing strategies of cariprazine from treatment initiation through switching strategies to concomitant medications.

IntroductionMotivation deficit is a significant aspect of lack of improvement in patients with schizophrenia especially with predominant negative symptoms (PNS). Therefore, improvement depends not only on symptoms reduction and better social functioning but also on patient engagement which is a key but less investigated aspect of successful treatment.ObjectivesTo investigate and compare patient engagement in PNS patients after cariprazine and risperidone treatment characterized by the 11 items of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-11).MethodsIn this phase 3 study patients suffering from PNS of schizophrenia (PANSS-FSNS≥24) were randomized to 26 weeks of treatment with either cariprazine or risperidone (target dose 4.5 and 4 mg/day, respectively). To compare the effects of the two drugs on patient engagement the PANSS-11 scale was used. Change from baseline (CfB) on the selected items and PANSS-11 total score were analyzed using mixed model of repeated measures approach without correction for multiplicity.ResultsPANSS-11 total score mean CfB were -11.20 (SD=0.43) for cariprazine-, and -9.44 (SD=0.45) for risperidone-treated patients with a -1.79 (95% CI=-3.01, -0.56) mean difference (p=0.004) in favor of cariprazine. Most item differences were statistically significant (N1, N2, N3, N4, N5, G16) or numerically higher (N6, G7, G13) for cariprazine versus risperidone.ConclusionsCariprazine significantly improved patient engagement in patients with PNS of schizophrenia compared to risperidone based on the PANSS-11 post-hoc analysis. These results suggest that cariprazine treatment may improve not only the symptoms and everyday functioning of PNS patients but their engagement with life.Conflict of interestStudies were funded by Gedeon Richter Plc. and Allergan Plc (prior to its acquisition by AbbVie). Dr. Laszlovszky, Dombi, Balogh, Dr Barabassy, Dr Vass, Dr. Szatmári and Dr. Németh are employees of Gedeon Richter Plc.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

The aim of this chapter is to summarize the state-of-the-art knowledge of clinical staging in schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Clinical staging has been introduced to psychiatry in the past two decades. Its primary goal is to divide the course of the disorder into recognizable stages based on seriousness, development and symptom characteristics in order to better predict prognosis and to adopt the most appropriate treatment strategies. The first staging model was developed in 1982. Since then several distinct concepts of clinical staging in psychiatry have emerged. To date, there is no clinical consensus regarding which staging model is the gold standard, nonetheless when merging them together an integrated staging concept arises. The integrated staging model of schizophrenia spectrum disorders is composed of four stages. The chapter will introduce the different staging models in a historical order as well as present the integrated staging model detailing the characteristics, timeline and dominating symptoms of each stage. Appropriate treatment strategies for the distinct stages will also be outlined.

Introduction Chronic schizophrenia patients are experiencing persistent and severe illness for more than 15-20 years and are usually suffering from long-term negative symptoms. Cariprazine, a novel D3-D2 partial agonist has been proven to be effective in the treatment of acute schizophrenia, however its ability to treat chronic patients has not been assessed yet. Objectives The primary aim of the present post-hoc analysis is to assess the efficacy of cariprazine in treating patients with chronic schizophrenia (late-stage and residual schizophrenia patients). Methods Data from 3 phase II/III 6-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials with similar design in patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia were pooled and patients with more than 15 years of schizophrenia were analysed (late-stage patients). Furthermore, schizophrenia patients experiencing predominantly negative symptoms from a 26-week, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, fixed-flexible-dose trial with an ICD-10 code of F20.5 were analysed post-hoc (residual patients). Results Altogether, 414 late stage (286 cariprazine and 128 placebo) and 35 residual (23 cariprazine and 12 risperidone) patients were identified. The pooled analysis evaluating mean change from baseline to week 6 in the PANSS total score indicated statistically significant difference in favour of cariprazine in the late stage (LSMD -6.7, p<0.01) subpopulation compared to placebo. The mean change from baseline in patients with residual schizophrenia in the cariprazine arm was -9.6 on the PANSS-FSNS scale, while -7.9 in the risperidone arm. Conclusions Based on the results, it seems that cariprazine might be a good treatment option for patients with chronic schizophrenia. Nonetheless, further studies are needed to confirm this. Disclosure I am an employee of Gedeon Richter Plc.