Background and purposeThe development of high‐resolution magnetic resonance imaging (HR‐MRI) has enabled submillimeter‐level evaluation of intracranial artery plaque and luminal thrombus. We sought to investigate the value of HR‐MRI in assessing the pathogenesis of acute intracranial artery thrombus.MethodsWe examined the presence of intracranial thrombus on three‐dimensional T1‐weighted HR‐MRI in acute ischemic stroke patients with intracranial artery occlusion on magnetic resonance angiography. We defined two thrombus‐related HR‐MRI features (peri‐thrombus plaque and distal residual flow beyond the thrombus) and analyzed their association with potential embolic sources.ResultsLuminal thrombus and a shrunken artery without luminal thrombus were detected in 162 (96.4%) and six (3.6%) of 168 patients with intracranial artery occlusion, respectively. Among 111 patients with culprit major artery thrombus, peri‐thrombus plaques were observed in 46.8% and distal residual flow beyond the thrombus in 64.0%. Patients with peri‐thrombus plaque had a higher prevalence of diabetes (44.2% vs. 25.4%; p = 0.037), a lower prevalence of potential sources of cardioembolism (0% vs. 16.9%; p = 0.002), and a nonsignificantly lower prevalence of potential embolic sources from extracranial arteries (9.6% vs. 20.3%; p = 0.186) than those without. Patients with distal residual flow beyond the thrombus had a lower prevalence of potential sources of cardioembolism (1.4% vs. 22.5%; p < 0.001) and smaller infarct volumes (5.0 [1.4–12.7] mL vs. 16.6 [2.4–94.6] mL; p = 0.012) than those without.ConclusionsOur study showed that HR‐MRI helps clarify the pathogenesis of acute intracranial artery thrombus. The presence of peri‐thrombus plaque and distal residual flow beyond the thrombus favor the stroke mechanism of atherosclerosis rather than cardioembolism.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.