Renewed interest has emerged in transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) with novel prognostic, diagnostic, and treatment algorithms. We aimed to investigate the incidence, prognostic factors, morbidity, and mortality of TA-TMA in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients. We enrolled consecutive HCT recipients (1990-2017). Among 758 patients, 116 (15.5%) were diagnosed with TA-TMA. In the multivariate analysis, TBI-based conditioning, viral infections, acute and chronic GVHD remained independent predictors of TA-TMA. With a median follow-up of 23 (range 0.1-329) months, TA-TMA resulted in significantly lower overall survival (OS). In the multivariate analysis, TA-TMA remained an independent predictor of OS, along with relapse, acute, and chronic GVHD. Among 116 TA-TMA patients, 70 developed renal (56) and/or neurologic (26) dysfunction that would be necessary for TA-TMA diagnosis according to the Bone Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network criteria. TA-TMA patients with renal dysfunction showed increased rates of acute GVHD, but no difference in OS compared to patients without renal dysfunction. However, neurologic dysfunction resulted in significantly lower OS. In conclusion, TA-TMA is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in allogeneic transplant recipients. Successful prevention and treatment strategies of infections and GVHD need to be timely employed to improve survival in this complex setting.
This retrospective study aimed to describe the Hellenic experience on the use of brentuximab vedotin (BV) in relapsed/refractory (R/R) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) given within its indication. From June 2011 to April 2015, ninety‐five patients with R/R HL, who received BV in 20 centers from Greece, were analyzed. Their median age was 33 years, and 62% were males. Sixty‐seven patients received BV after autologous stem cell transplantation failure, whereas 28 patients were treated with BV without a prior autologous stem cell transplantation, due to advanced age/comorbidities or chemorefractory disease. The median number of prior treatments was 4 and 44% of the patients were refractory to their most recent therapy. The median number of BV cycles was 8 (range, 2‐16), and the median time to best response was the fourth cycle. Fifty‐seven patients achieved an objective response: twenty‐two (23%), a complete response (CR), and 35 patients (37%), a partial, for an overall response rate of 60%. Twelve patients (13%) had stable disease, and the remaining twenty‐six (27%) had progressive disease as their best response. At a median follow‐up of 11.5 months, median progression‐free survival and overall survival were 8 and 26.5 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that chemosensitivity to treatment administered before BV was associated with a significantly increased probability of achieving response to BV (P = .005). Bulky disease (P = .01) and response to BV (P <.001) were significant for progression‐free survival, while refractoriness to most recent treatment (P = .04), bulky disease (P = .005), and B‐symptoms (P = .001) were unfavorable factors for overall survival. Among the 22 CRs, 5 remain in CR with no further treatment after BV at a median follow‐up of 13 months. In conclusion, our data indicate that BV is an effective treatment for R/R HL patients even outside clinical trials. Whether BV can cure a fraction of patients remains to be seen.
The role of total body irradiation (TBI) in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) remains controversial. Therefore, we investigated long-term treatment outcomes of transplanted ALL patients aiming to identify prognostic factors and the impact of conditioning. We enrolled consecutive ALL patients transplanted from 1990 to 2016, following TBI- or busulfan (Bu)-based conditioning regimen. We studied 151 ALL patients transplanted in first complete remission (CR) (60), other CR (33), or relapsed/refractory disease (58) from sibling (87), and HLA-matched (42) or mismatched (17) unrelated and alternative donors (5). High-dose fractionated TBI-based conditioning was administered in 84. No differences were observed in baseline characteristics, except for disease stage at transplant, donor type, and graft source. With a follow-up of 19.0 (0.5-170.5) in TBI and 14.5 (1.2-319.1) months in non-TBI patients, there was no difference in acute (grades II-IV) or chronic GVHD, thrombotic microangiopathy, and bacterial or fungal infections. Only viral infections were significantly increased in the non-TBI group. There was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence (CI) of treatment-related or relapse mortality and disease-free or overall survival (OS). In the multivariate analysis, unfavorable pre-transplant predictors of OS were age (p = 0.024), advanced disease stage (p = 0.007), and female-to-male donor (p = 0.006). Interestingly, TBI patients younger than 40 years had significantly higher OS (55.1%, p = 0.023) and DFS (48.6%, p = 0.020). In conclusion, high-dose TBI is feasible in younger patients providing better survival. The choice between TBI- or Bu-conditioning regimens remains challenging.
Limited and conflicting data exist on outcomes of patients with extramedullary relapses (EMRs) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) for acute leukemias. We retrospectively reviewed charts of consecutive allo-HCT recipients who underwent transplantation in our center with the indication of acute leukemia (July 1990 to July 2018). Incidences of isolated EMR (iEMR) and bone marrow relapse (BMR) were calculated using cumulative incidence (CI) analysis, with each and treatment-related mortality considered a competing risk. We studied 554 allo-HCT recipients for 1.8 years (range, .04 to 27.75). Ten-year CI of 10.5% for iEMR was associated only with advanced disease phase at transplantation, whereas 10-year CI of 34.8% for BMR was independently associated with pretransplant disease phase, lines of treatment, and fungal infections. Most iEMR and BMR patients (75% and 81%, respectively) received systemic treatment combined with local radiation for iEMR (26%) and donor lymphocyte infusions (16% and 28%, respectively) when feasible. Extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was recorded in 47% of iEMR and 48% of BMR patients. Outcomes were poor both in iEMR (10year overall survival [OS], 18.3%) and BMR (10-year OS, 19.1%). Independent predictors of OS were disease phase, type of donor, acute and chronic GVHD, fungal infections, iEMR, and BMR. In a large population with long-term follow-up, incidence of iEMR was relatively high, developed at the late post-transplant period, and was associated only with disease phase at transplantation. Furthermore, iEMR and BMR conferred similarly poor outcomes despite systemic treatment or extensive chronic GVHD.
The outcome of patients with relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R cHL) after autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) is poor. Recently, the anti-CD30 monoclonal antibody-drug conjugate, brentuximab vedotin (BV), has shown remarkable activity in the setting of R/R cHL. In the pivotal phase II study, BV produced an overall response rate of 75% and a median progression-free survival of 6.7 months. Although these results have been reproduced by large registry studies, the impact of BV on the overall survival (OS) of patients with R/R cHL has not been addressed so far. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of BV on OS in the setting of post auto-SCT R/R cHL. Analysis was performed in a group of patients with R/R cHL after a previous auto-SCT reported in the Greek registry during the last 2 decades. By using a multivariate model and censoring patients at the time of subsequent allo-SCT or treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors, we showed that treatment with BV in the posttransplant relapse setting has a positive impact on the outcome and results in significant improvement of OS. To our knowledge, this the first published study, addressing the impact of BV on the OS in the setting of posttransplant relapse.
(1) Background: survivors of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) suffer from morbidity and mortality due to cardiovascular events. We hypothesized that vascular injury and pro-coagulant activity are evident in alloHCT survivors without existing alloHCT complications or relapse. (2) Methods: we enrolled consecutive adult alloHCT survivors without established cardiovascular disease and control individuals matched for traditional cardiovascular risk factors (January–December 2019). Circulating microvesicles (MVs) of different cellular origins (platelet, erythrocyte, and endothelial) were measured by a standardized flow cytometry protocol as novel markers of vascular injury and pro-coagulant activity. (3) Results: we recruited 45 survivors after a median of 2.3 (range 1.1–13.2) years from alloHCT, and 45 controls. The majority of patients suffered from acute (44%) and/or chronic (66%) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Although the two groups were matched for traditional cardiovascular risk factors, alloHCT survivors showed significantly increased platelet and erythrocyte MVs compared to controls. Within alloHCT survivors, erythrocyte MVs were significantly increased in patients with a previous history of thrombotic microangiopathy. Interestingly, endothelial MVs were significantly increased only in alloHCT recipients of a myeloablative conditioning. Furthermore, MVs of different origins showed a positive association with each other. (4) Conclusions: endothelial dysfunction and increased thrombotic risk are evident in alloHCT recipients long after alloHCT, independently of traditional cardiovascular risk factors. An apparent synergism of these pathophysiological processes may be strongly involved in the subsequent establishment of cardiovascular disease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.