The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher's version. Please see the repository url above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription. 2 Abstract PurposeAlthough many international supply chains are (most often unknowingly) connected to slave labour activities, supply chain managers and research have so far neglected the issue. This will most likely change soon as civil society lobbying and new legislation imposes increasing litigation and reputational risks on companies operating international supply chains. Design/methodology/approachThe paper provides a definition of slavery, explores potentials for knowledge exchange with other disciplines, discusses management tools for detecting slavery as well as suitable company responses after its detection, and outlines avenues for future research. FindingsDue to a lack of effective indicators, new tools and indicator systems need to be developed that consider the specific social, cultural and geographical context of supply regions. After detection of slavery, multi-stakeholder-partnerships, community-centred approaches, and supplier development appear to be effective responses. Research limitations/implicationsNew theory development in supply chain management is urgently needed to facilitate the understanding, avoidance and elimination of slavery in supply chains. As a starting point for future research, we conceptualize the challenges of slavery to supply chain management, focussing on capabilities and specific institutional context. Practical implicationsThe paper provides a starting point for the development of practices and tools for identifying and removing slave labour from supply chains. Originality/valueAlthough representing a substantial threat to current supply chain models, slavery has so far not been addressed in supply chain management research.

No abstract

Far more often than Hemingway's work, the writings of James Agee, John Dos Passos, Arthur Koestler, and George Orwell are examined for their politics, and their politics of form. But Hemingway's multi-focal aesthetic situates him alongside these more obviously politicized writers. Built upon his famous "iceberg" theory of omission, and imitating film rather than single-shot still photography, Hemingway's multi-focal aesthetic confronted the problem of "official" history and interwar doubts over language's ongoing capacity for expression.

This article discusses the unequal impact of Covid‐19 on the lives of the children of survivors of modern slavery, child victims of exploitation and children at risk of exploitation in the UK. It draws on research that has analysed the risks and impacts of Covid‐19 on victims and survivors of modern slavery. It explores how pandemic responses may have hindered these children's rights to education, food, safety, development and participation and representation in legal processes. It suggests that the pandemic should be used as an impetus to address inequalities that existed pre‐Covid‐19 and those that have been exacerbated by it.

No abstract