BackgroundMechanical lumbar traction has been used to treat spinal disorders and low back pain for centuries, since Hippocrates(.2,3Although the supine position is generally preferred, the patient may also be positioned prone during traction treatment(.4,5 However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have compared the effects of lumbar traction in these two different positions for patients with chronic LBP.ObjectivesTo compare the effects of mechanical lumbar traction either in the supine or prone position with conventional physical therapy(PT) in patients with chronic low back pain(LBP) and lumbosacral nerve root involvement in terms of disability, pain, and mobility.MethodsParticipants(n=125) were randomly assingned to receive 15 sessions of PT with additional mechanical lumbar traction either in the supine position (supine traction group), or in the prone position (prone traction group), or only PT without traction(PT only group). Patients were assessed at baseline and at the end of the PT sessions in terms of disability, pain, and mobility. Disability was assessed using the modified Oswesty Disability Index (ODI); pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS); and lumbar mobility was assessed using the modified lumbar Schober test (mLST).Results118 patients completed the trial. All groups improved significantly in the ODI, VAS, and mLST (p<0.05) (table 1). In the between-group analysis, improvements of ODI and VAS were found significantly better in the prone traction group compared with the PT only group (adjusted p=0.031 and.006, respectively).ConclusionsAddition of traction in prone position to other modalities resulted in larger immediate improvements in terms of pain and disability, and the results suggest that when using traction, prone traction might be first-choice. Further research is needed to confirm the benefits of lumbar traction in the prone position.References[1] Marketos SG, Skiadas P. Hippocrates. The father of spine surgery. Spine1999;24:1381–7.[2] Krause M, Refshauge KM, Dessen M, et al. Lumbar spine traction: evaluation of effects and recommended application for treatment. Manual therapy2000;5:72–81.[3] Harte AA, Gracey JH, Baxter GD. Current use of lumbar traction in the management of low back pain: results of a survey of physiotherapists in the UK. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation2005;86:1164–9.[4] Fritz JM, Lindsay W, Matheson JW, et al. Is there a subgroup of patients with low back pain likely to benefit from mechanical traction? Results of a randomized clinical trial and subgrouping analysis. Spine2007;32:E793–800.Disclosure of InterestNone declaredAbstract THU0539 – Table 1 Supine traction group(n=39) Prone traction group(n=39) Only PT group(n=40) preinterventionpostinterventionPpreinterventionpostinterventionP preinterventionpostinterventionP ODI 50.4±22.5 33.2±15.5 .001 53.8±15.1 35.9±15.9 .001 49.5±15.1 40.9±17.6 .002VAS8.0±1.64.3±2.2.0018.0±1.73.7±2.7.0017.7±1.55.2±2.3.001mLST19.4±1.920.7±1.8.00118.8±1.820.5±1.3.00119.7±1.920.8±1.7.001
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.