Routing protocols for wireless ad hoc networks have traditionally focused on finding paths with minimum hop count. However, such paths can include slow or lossy links, leading to poor throughput. A routing algorithm can select better paths by explicitly taking the quality of the wireless links into account. In this paper, we conduct a detailed, empirical evaluation of the performance of three link-quality metrics-ETX, per-hop RTT, and per-hop packet pair-and compare them against minimum hop count. We study these metrics using a DSR-based routing protocol running in a wireless testbed. We find that the ETX metric has the best performance when all nodes are stationary. We also find that the per-hop RTT and per-hop packet-pair metrics perform poorly due to self-interference. Interestingly, the hop-count metric outperforms all of the link-quality metrics in a scenario where the sender is mobile.

Data copying and checksumming are the most expensive operations when doing high-bandwidth network IO over a highspeed network. Under some conditions, outboard buffering and checksumming can eliminate accesses to the data, thus making communication less expensive and faster. One of the scenarios in which outboard buffering pays off is the common case of applications accessing the network using the Berkeley sockets interface and the Internet protocol stack. In this paper we describe the changes that were made to a BSD protocol stack to make use of a network adaptor that supports outboard buffering and checksumming. Our goal is not only to achieve "single copy" communication for application that use sockets, but to also have efficient communication for in-kernel applications and for applications using other networks. Performance measurements show that for large reads and writes the single-copy path through the stack is significantly more efficient than the original implementation.