Background: Primary malignant cardiac tumors (PMCTs) are fatal, but up to now, there is still a lack of survival prediction model for prognosis evaluation. We developed nomograms to predict overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) for PMCTs by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database.Methods: A total of 506 PMCTs participants were identified in the SEER database from 1973 to 2014 and were randomly assigned into the training cohort (N = 354) and the validation cohort (N = 152). The prognostic factors for PMCTs were identified by Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox analysis and further incorporated to build OS and CSS nomograms. The nomograms were internally and externally validated via concordance indexes (C-index) and calibration curves.Results: The independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS in PMCTs were associated with age at diagnosis, histopathology, tumor stage, cancer-directed surgery, and chemotherapy (all P < .05). In the internal validation, the C-index values were 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68-0.75) for OS nomogram, and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.67-0.74) for CSS nomogram. In the external validation, the C-index values were 0.71 (95% CI: 0.66-0.77) for OS nomogram, and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.65-0.77) for CSS nomogram. The calibration curves of internal and external validation showed consistency between the nomograms and the actual observation. The risk stratification of PMCTs was significant distinction (P < .05). Conclusion:We developed and validated credible nomograms to predict OS and CSS in PMCTs. These nomograms can be offered to clinicians to more precisely estimate the survival and identify risk stratification of PMCTs. K E Y W O R D S cancer-specific survival, nomograms, overall survival, primary malignant cardiac tumors, risk classification systems

PurposeTo study the cardiovascular death (CVD) risk in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) patients with chemotherapy.MethodsWe obtained 2,020 PCNSL participants and 88,613 non-central nervous system lymphoma (NCNSL) participants with chemotherapy from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2004 to 2015. A 1:3 propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce the imbalance between PCNSL participants with and without chemotherapy, as well as the imbalance between PCNSL and NCNSL participants with chemotherapy. Competing risks regressions were conducted to evaluate the independent influence of chemotherapy on CVD.ResultsAfter 1:3 PSM, the CVD risk in PCNSL patients with chemotherapy was lower than those without chemotherapy [decreased 53%, adjusted HR, 0.469 (95% CI, 0.255–0.862; P = 0.015)] as well as NCNSL patients with chemotherapy [decreased 36%, adjusted HR in model 1, 0.636 (95% CI, 0.439–0.923; P = 0.017)]. The CVD risk of chemotherapy decreased in PCNSL patients with age at diagnosis &gt;60 years old [adjusted HR, 0.390 (95% CI, 0.200–0.760; P = 0.006)], and those patients diagnosed at 2010 to 2015 [adjusted HR, 0.339 (95% CI, 0.118–0.970; P = 0.044)].ConclusionPCNSL patients with chemotherapy are associated with lower CVD risk. Our findings may provide new foundations for that chemotherapy is the first-line treatment for PCNSL patients, according to a cardiovascular risk perspective.

No abstract

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare but highly aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Treatment-related cardiovascular lesion has become one of the most common complications in patients with tumor. However, very little is known about the cardiovascular death (CVD) of the patients with PCNSL. This study aims at identifying the cardiovascular outcomes of PCNSL patients and making comparison on CVD with extra central nervous system lymphoma (ECNSL). Clinical information of PCNSL and ECNSL was retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. The risk factors of CVD in PCNSL patients and the comparison on the CVD hazard between PCNSL and ECNSL were assessed with the competing risks regression. A 1:2 propensity score matching was used to reduce the imbalanced baseline characteristics between PCNSL and ECNSL. Four thousand thirty-eight PCNSL subjects and 246,760 ECNSL subjects were enrolled in this retrospective study. CVD was the leading cause (41.2%) of non-cancer death in PCNSL patients and mostly occurred within the first year of diagnosis. Age over 60s and diagnosis in 2000–2008 were significantly associated with the elevated risk of CVD in PCNSL patients, while chemotherapy and radiotherapy play no role on the cardiovascular outcomes. Compared with ECNSL patients, the risk of CVD in PCNSL patients were 40% approximately lower. The risk of CVD in the patients with PCNSL still remains unclear currently. Clinicians ought to pay more attention on the risk of CVD in PCNSL patients, especially the elder patients within the first year of diagnosis.