No abstract

This is a retrospective review of 26 patients with sciatica due to the piriformis muscle syndrome. Most patients had pain in the buttock area and sciatica, and most experienced difficulty walking and sitting, even for short periods of time. Reproduction of the sciatica upon deep palpation, either by gluteal or rectal route, was diagnostic. Reproduction of sciatica occurred in 92% of the patients upon deep digital palpation and in 100% of the patients upon rectal or pelvic examination. Other signs were helpful but not consistent. After the appropriate diagnosis, the treatment was relatively easy and rewarding. This study emphasizes that the diagnosis of piriformis muscle syndrome is clinical; without the appropriate clinical examination, it can be easily misdiagnosed.

for intravenous regional anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1989;68:328-32. thetic, sensory, and motor blockade when injected into the isolated extremity, unpleasant psychotomimetic effects after the reltwse of the tourniquet limit the usefulness of this use of krtamine. Ketamine cannot be recommended for intravenous regional anesthesia unless these unpleasant side effects are a~o l i s~, e~ or corltroJled by ,neans of pl,armaco~ogic ad;uvnnts.We studied ketamine iritravenous regional anesthesia of the upper extremity in zdunteers using concentrations of 0.5%, 0.3%, and 0.2%. Ketamine 0.5 and 0.3% produced adequate intravenous regional anesthesia. Anesthesia was inadequate when a 0.2% concentration was used. However, although the 0.3% coilcentration provides coniplcte sympo-

No abstract

A review of the anatomy of the cervical plexus and surrounding structures suggests a single-injection technic which simplifies anesthesia of the cervical plexus and increases the margin of safety in this procedure. Used by the authors, the technic has been successful in 97 percent of over 100 cases.

A new local anaesthetic, ropivacaine hydrochloride, was used in a concentration of 0.5 per cent in 32 patients receiving a subclavian perivascular block for upper extremity surgery. One group (n = 15) received 0.5 per cent ropivacaine without epinephrine and a second group (n = 17) received 0.5 per cent ropivacaine with epinephrine in a concentration of 1:200,000. Anaesthesia was achieved in 87 per cent of the patients in both groups in all of the C5 through T1 brachial plexus dermatomes. Motor block was profound with 100 per cent of patients in both groups developing paresis at both the shoulder and hand and 100 per cent developing paralysis at the shoulder. There was a rapid initial onset of sensory block (a mean of less than four minutes for analgesia) with a prolonged duration (a mean of greater than 13 hr of analgesia). The addition of epinephrine did not significantly affect the quality or onset of sensory or motor block. The duration of sensory block was reduced by epinephrine at T1 for analgesia and at C7, C8, and T1 for anaesthesia. The duration of sensory block in the remaining brachial plexus dermatomes as well as the duration of motor block was not effected by epinephrine. There was no evidence of cardiovascular or central nervous system toxicity in either group with a mean dose of 2.5-2.6 mg.kg-1 ropivacaine.

No abstract

No abstract