The human genome, like other mammalian genomes, encodes numerous natural antisense transcripts (NATs) that have been classified into head-to-head, tail-to-tail, or fully overlapped categories in reference to their sense transcripts. Evidence for NAT-mediated epigenetic silencing of sense transcription remains scanty. The DHRS4 gene encodes a metabolic enzyme and forms a gene cluster with its two immediately downstream homologous genes, DHRS4L2 and DHRS4L1 , generated by gene duplication. We identified a head-to-head NAT of DHRS4 , designated AS1DHRS4, which markedly regulates the expression of these three genes in the DHRS4 gene cluster. By pairing with ongoing sense transcripts, AS1DHRS4 not only mediates deacetylation of histone H3 and demethylation of H3K4 in cis for the DHRS4 gene, but also interacts physically in trans with the epigenetic modifiers H3K9- and H3K27-specific histone methyltransferases G9a and EZH2, targeting the promoters of the downstream DHRS4L2 and DHRS4L1 genes to induce local repressive H3K9me2 and H3K27me3 histone modifications. Furthermore, AS1DHRS4 induces DNA methylation in the promoter regions of DHRS4L2 by recruiting DNA methyltransferases. This study demonstrates that AS1DHRS4, as a long noncoding RNA, simultaneously controls the chromatin state of each gene within the DHRS4 gene cluster in a discriminative manner. This finding provides an example of transcriptional control over the multiple and highly homologous genes in a tight gene cluster, and may help explain the role of antisense RNAs in the regulation of duplicated genes as the result of genomic evolution.
The human DHRS4 gene cluster consists of DHRS4 and two immediately downstream homologous genes, DHRS4L2 and DHRS4L1, generated by evolutionarily gene-duplication events. We previously demonstrated that a head-to-head natural antisense transcript (NAT) of DHRS4, denoted DHRS4-AS1, regulates all three genes of the DHRS4 gene cluster. However, it is puzzling that DHRS4L2 and DHRS4L1 did not evolve their own specific NATs to regulate themselves, as it seems both have retained sequences highly homologous to DHRS4-AS1. In a search of the DHRS4-AS1 region for nearby enhancers, we identified an enhancer located 13.8 kb downstream of the DHRS4-AS1 transcriptional start site. We further showed, by using a chromosome conformation capture (3C) assay, that this enhancer is capable of physically interacting with the DHRS4-AS1 promoter through chromosomal looping. The enhancer produced an eRNA, termed AS1eRNA, that enhanced DHRS4-AS1 transcription by mediating the spatial interactions of the enhancer and DHRS4-AS1 promoter in cooperation with RNA polymerase II and p300/CBP. Moreover, the distributions of activating acetyl-H3 and H3K4me3 modifications were found to be greater at the DHRS4-AS1 promoter than at the homologous duplicated regions. We propose that AS1eRNA-driven DNA looping and activating histone modifications promote the expression of DHRS4-AS1 to economically control the DHRS4 gene cluster.
The human immune response is a complex process that responds to numerous exogenous antigens in preventing infection by microorganisms, as well as to endogenous components in the surveillance of tumors and autoimmune diseases, and a great number of molecules are necessary to carry the functional complexity of immune activity. Alternative splicing of pre-mRNA plays an important role in immune cell development and regulation of immune activity through yielding diverse transcriptional isoforms to supplement the function of limited genes associated with the immune reaction. In addition, multiple factors have been identified as being involved in the control of alternative splicing at the cis, trans, or co-transcriptional level, and the aberrant splicing of RNA leads to the abnormal modulation of immune activity in infections, immune diseases, and tumors. In this review, we summarize the recent discoveries on the generation of immune-associated alternative splice variants, clinical disorders, and possible regulatory mechanisms. We also discuss the immune responses to the neoantigens produced by alternative splicing, and finally, we issue some alternative splicing and immunity correlated questions based on our knowledge.
Estrogen receptors (ERs) are frequently expressed in human tumor tissues. There have been several studies concerning ER expression in esophageal cancers, yet the results are inconsistent, and the prognostic value of the receptors remains unclear. In the present study, we investigated the expression of ER protein and its correlation with clinical features of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients. Immunohistochemical staining for the ERs was carried out on paraffin-embedded primary tumor tissue sections from 89 patients with ESCC. Quantitative analyses were performed to determine the prognostic value of the expression of ERs, and Pearson's correlation was used to examine the relationship between ERα and ERβ expression levels. Our results showed that ERα immunoreactivity was significantly lower in ESCC than that in the non-neoplastic epithelium (P=0.0445), whereas the ERβ status was much stronger in ESCC than that in the non-neoplastic epithelium (P=0.0243). A significant inverse correlation was observed between ERα expression and depth of tumor invasion (P=0.0426). Correlation analysis revealed a statistically significant inverse correlation between the expression of ERα and ERβ in ESCC (r=-0.2902, P=0.0058). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the patients with ERα expression (21/89) had a better outcome than patients without ERα expression (P=0.0280), whereas patients with high ERβ immunoreactivity (44/89) were significantly associated with worse survival (P=0.0366). In conclusion, ERα and ERβ levels were inversely correlated, and the downregulation of ERα and upregulation of ERβ may indicate unfavorable prognosis of ESCC.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.