BACKGROUND Coactivator‐associated arginine methyltransferase 1 (CARM1) is a transcriptional coactivator of the androgen receptor (AR). It is involved in the regulation of the biologic functions of the AR. It remains to be determined whether CARM1 is involved in prostatic carcinogenesis. METHODS The expression of CARM1 in normal prostate epithelium, high‐grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), and prostate carcinoma tissue was examined in 66 previously untreated patients with prostate carcinomas, as well as 12 patients with hormone‐independent prostate carcinoma, using immunohistochemical methods. RESULTS Cell staining was observed in the cytoplasm and the nucleus. In 66 patients without previous hormonal treatment, the percentage of cells that stained positively for CARM1 in benign prostate tissue specimens (mean values: cytoplasm, 23%; nucleus, 16%) was statistically significantly less than the percentage of positively stained cells in PIN (mean values: cytoplasm, 56%; nucleus, 30%; P < 0.001) and in prostatic adenocarcinoma specimens (mean values: cytoplasm, 79%; nucleus, 53%; P < 0.001). The difference between adenocarcinoma and PIN also was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The staining intensity for CARM1 was significantly lower in benign prostate tissue specimens compared with PIN and prostatic adenocarcinoma specimens (P < 0.001). In the 12 patients with androgen‐independent prostatic adenocarcinoma, the expression of CARM1 was significantly increased when compared with patients without previous hormonal treatment. Expression of CARM1 was not correlated with age, Gleason score sum, pathologic stage, lymph node metastasis, extraprostatic extension, surgical margin status, vascular invasion, or perineural invasion. CONCLUSIONS The authors found that overexpression of CARM1 was involved in the development of prostate carcinoma as well as androgen‐independent prostate carcinoma. Since CARM1 is functionally different from most other transcriptional coactivators of the AR, it may serve as a new target for the treatment of hormone‐independent prostate carcinoma. Cancer 2004. © 2004 American Cancer Society.

EphA2 is a transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinase that is overexpressed in many carcinomas. Specific targeting of EphA2 with monoclonal antibodies is sufficient to inhibit the growth, migration and invasiveness of aggressive cancers in animal models. Using immunohistochemical analyses, we measured the expression of EphA2 in prostatic adenocarcinoma, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and adjacent benign prostate tissue from ninety-three radical prostatectomy specimens. These results were related to multiple clinical and pathologicalcharacteristics. The fraction of cells staining positively with EphA2 in benign prostatic epithelium (mean, 12%) was significantly lower than that in high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (mean, 67%, P < 0.001) and prostatic adenocarcinoma (mean, 85%, P < 0.001). Moreover, the intensity of EphA2 immunoreactivity in prostatic adenocarcinoma was significantly higher than in benign prostatic tissue (P < 0.001) or high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (P < 0.001). Benign prostatic epithelium showed weak or no immunoreactivity for EphA2 in all cases examined. Whereas EphA2 immunoreactivity related to neoplastic transformation, it did not correlate with other clinical and pathological parameters examined. Our data suggest that EphA2 levels increase as prostatic epithelial cells progress toward a more aggressive phenotype. Progressively higher levels of EphA2 in high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and prostatic carcinoma are consistent with recent evidence that EphA2 functions as a powerful oncogene. Moreover, the presence of high levels of EphA2 in these cells suggests opportunities for prostate cancer prevention and treatment.

Purpose: The 14-3-3 family proteins are highly conserved over many mammalian species. The isoform (also called HME-1 or stratifin) is expressed in epithelial cells. Loss of 14-3-3 is associated with failure to arrest the cell cycle at the G 2 -M phase checkpoint after DNA damage that leads to increased G 2 -type chromosomal aberrations. The role of 14-3-3 in prostatic carcinogenesis is uncertain.Experimental Design: We studied one hundred and eleven specimens of invasive prostate adenocarcinoma with paired, adjacent high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and normal prostate epithelium. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect the expression of 14-3-3. The findings were correlated with various clinical pathological parameters.Results: 14-3-3 is ubiquitously expressed at high levels in normal prostate epithelium. Its expression is significantly decreased in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and prostatic adenocarcinoma. Ninety percent of samples of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia had no or low 14-3-3 expression. Ninety-seven percent of invasive adenocarcinomas had no or low 14-3-3 expression. In most specimens (90%), suppression of 14-3-3 expression occurred during the development of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia from normal epithelium.Conclusions: Our data suggest that loss of 14-3-3 contributes to the development of prostate adenocarcinoma. 14-3-3 expression is significantly decreased during the progression of normal prostatic epithelium to prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive cancer.

Background In China, gastric cancer (GC) ranks second in incidence and mortality. Over 80% of patients with GC were diagnosed at an advanced stage with poor clinical outcome. Chemotherapy was the mainstream treatment with limited benefit. Apatinib, an inhibitor of targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2), has been approved for third-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer. However, the data of apatinib treatment in the real-world setting are limited. In this real-world study, we aimed to understand the current treatment pattern of apatinib, investigate the effectiveness and safety of apatinib in real-world settings, and explore the potential factors associated with the clinical outcomes. Methods This was a prospective, multicenter observational study in a real-world setting. Patients aged ≥18 years with histologic diagnosis of advanced GC were eligible for enrollment. The eligible patients received either apatinib monotherapy or apatinib plus chemotherapy by physician’s discretion. Apatinib treatment could be used as first-line, second-line, or third-line and above therapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), ORR, DCR, and safety profile. Results A total of 737 patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with apatinib were included in the FAS population. A total of 54.9% patients used apatinib monotherapy and 45.1% patients used apatinib combination therapy. A total of 44.1% patients received apatinib in first-line treatment, 28.2% in second-line, and 27.7% in third-line and above. In first-line treatment, the objective response rate (ORR) was 9.09% and 16.42% in apatinib monotherapy and combination therapy groups, and disease control rate (DCR) was 78.41% and 89.29%, respectively. Patients who received combination therapy achieved significantly longer median progression-free survival (mPFS; 6.18 vs 3.52 months, p <0.01) and median overall survival (mOS; 8.72 vs 5.92 months, p <0.01) compared with monotherapy. In second-line and third-line therapy, combination therapy showed a better trend in tumor response and survival outcomes compared with monotherapy. For all patients, apatinib combined with paclitaxel were associated with longer mPFS compared with other combinations (8.88 vs 6.62 months). Multivariate analysis showed that combination with paclitaxel ( p =0.02) and experience of apatinib-related specific AEs ( p <0.01) were independent predictors for PFS and OS. The safety profile was tolerable and no unexpected adverse events were reported. Conclusion In a real-world setting, apatinib showed a favorable effectiveness and safety profile in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Apatinib combination therapy, especially combined with paclitaxel, might lead to better survival benefit in first-line treat...

Context. Modified Chaihu Shugan powder (MCSP) is a popular traditional Chinese herbal formula for functional dyspepsia, which is revised from Chaihu Shugan San and recorded in a medical classic works of China. However, its role and effect in treating functional dyspepsia have not been well established. Objective. To assess the effect and safety of modified Chaihu Shugan powder for functional dyspepsia. Methods. We searched the published and unpublished studies up to August 2012. Only RCTs of modified Chaihu Shugan powder with or without prokinetic drugs versus prokinetic drugs in the patients diagnosed with functional dyspepsia were included. Results. Twenty-two clinical trials involving 1998 participants were included. There were evidences that modified Chaihu Shugan powder (RR = 1.20, 95%, CI 1.14 to 1.27) and modified Chaihu Shugan powder plus prokinetic drugs (RR = 1.18, 95%, CI 1.11 to 1.25) were significantly better treatment options than prokinetic drugs alone in improving symptoms. No serious adverse events were described in the included trials. Conclusions. This meta-analysis showed that modified Chaihu Shugan powder alone or in combination with prokinetic drugs might be more effective than prokinetic drugs alone. However, with poor methodological quality, all the included trials were at high risk of bias. Further large-scale high-quality trials are required for assessment.